女性占据了心理学博士项目毕业生的大多数，但在教授职位上尚未实现平等。发表论文推动职业发展，这突显了研究基于发表的卓越性指标的必要性。据我们所知，受邀投稿的作者身份——研究声望的一个代理指标——尚未成为任何心理学研究的焦点。在这项横断面研究中，我们调查了五本顶级心理学期刊（2015-2019年）中受邀投稿的作者身份：《公共利益心理科学》、《心理学年鉴》、《认知科学趋势》、《临床心理学年鉴》和《组织心理学与组织行为年鉴》。我们假设女性会被低估。作者性别是通过公开可用的细节（例如，专业网站上的代词）分类的。主要结果是女性单独、第一或可能受邀作者的比例，相对于R1机构中心理学全职和副教授女性比例（42.3%）。在1828个作者职位（713篇文章）中，女性占据了35.6%。相对于提名的基准率，女性被显著低估。当多作者出版物中可能的受邀作者是女性时，第一作者是女性的论文占51.0%；当可能的受邀作者是男性时，第一作者是女性的论文占34.1%。这些发现与先前的研究一致，并通过表明心理学中的性别发表差距在受邀投稿中加剧且由特定子领域驱动，扩展了研究。需要继续努力纠正受邀投稿作者身份中的性别差异。（PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，版权所有）

Women comprise the majority of graduates from psychology doctoral programs, but equity is yet to be achieved in the professoriate. Publication drives career advancement, underscoring the need to investigate publication-based metrics of eminence. To our knowledge, authorship of invited submissions—a proxy of research esteem—has not been the focus of any psychology studies. In this cross-sectional study, authorship of invited submission(s) in five elite psychology journals (2015–2019) was investigated: Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Annual Review of Psychology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, and Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. We hypothesized that women would be underrepresented. Author gender was classified using publicly available details (e.g., pronouns on professional websites). Primary outcomes were the proportion of women solo-, first-, or likely invited authors, relative to the proportion of women full and associate professors in psychology at R1 institutions (42.3%). Of 1,828 authorship positions (713 articles), 35.6% were occupied by women. Relative to the nominated base rate, women were disproportionately underrepresented. When the likely invited author on a multi-author publication was a woman, the first author was a woman on 51.0% of papers; when the likely invited author was a man, the first author was a woman on 34.1% of papers. These findings align with prior studies and extend the research by demonstrating that the gender publication gap in psychology is exacerbated in invited submissions and driven by particular subfields. Continued efforts are needed to redress gender disparities in authorship of invited submissions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)