全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 真实世界经济学(含财经时事)
2975 19
2011-12-05

Pain in the Public Sector

Published: December 4, 2011

         Buried in the relatively positive numbers contained in the November jobs report was some very bad news for those who work in the public sector. There were 20,000 government workers laid off last month, by far the largest drop for any sector of the economy, mostly from states, counties and cities.

          That continues a troubling trend that’s been building for years, one that has had a particularly harsh effect on black workers. While the private sector has been adding jobs since the end of 2009, more than half a million government positions have been lost since the recession.

            In most cases, states and cities had to lay off workers because of declining tax revenues, or reduced federal aid because of Washington’s inexplicable decision to focus more on the deficit in the near term than on jobs.

            Those layoffs mean a lower quality of life when there are fewer teachers, pothole repair crews and nurses. On Thursday, a deteriorating budget situation prompted what officials in Marion, Ind., called a “radical reorganization” of city services, which will result in the layoffs of 15 police officers (out of 58) and 12 firefighters (out of 50).

          The cutbacks hurt more than just services. As Timothy Williams of The Times reported last week, they hit black workers particularly hard. Millions of African-Americans — one in five who are employed — have entered the middle class through government employment, and they tend to make 25 percent more than other black workers. Now tens of thousands are leaving both their jobs and the middle class. Chicago, for example, is laying off 212 employees in the upcoming fiscal year, two-thirds of whom are black.

           That’s one reason the black unemployment rate went up last month, to 15.5 percent from 15.1. The effect is severe, destabilizing black neighborhoods and making it harder for young people to replicate their parents’ climb up the economic ladder. “The reliance on these jobs has provided African-Americans a path upward,” said Robert Zieger, an emeritus professor of history at the University of Florida. “But it is also a vulnerability.”

            Many Republicans, however, don’t regard government jobs as actual jobs, and are eager to see them disappear. Republican governors around the Midwest have aggressively tried to break the power of public unions while slashing their work forces, and Congressional Republicans have proposed paying for a payroll tax cut by reducing federal employment rolls by 10 percent through attrition. That’s 200,000 jobs, many of which would be filled by blacks and Hispanics and others who tend to vote Democratic, and thus are considered politically superfluous.

               But every layoff, whether public or private, is a life, and a livelihood, and a family. And too many of them are getting battered by the economic storm.

A version of this editorial appeared in print on December 5, 2011, on page A26 of the New York edition with the headline: Pain in the Public Sector.

感谢蹦迪版主帮忙选帖,还有一篇比较好的文章,但我没看完,也有点长。先把这篇奉上吧。这篇比较简单,好理解。欢迎大家讨论一下我国的公共部门就业哈

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2011-12-6 09:31:09
我觉得有这么几个问题值得思考:1、Public Sector存在的终极目的是提供服务OR创造就业呢?
2、在ZF部门效率提高的情况下(诸如执政策略的转变,技术的创新应用),必然会导致现有基础上公务人员队伍的缩减,这又是好还是坏?
3、实证的或规范的分析孰优孰劣难以评判,但于就业这一点来讲,我很赞同文中最后一段所说,“every layoff, whether public or private, is a life, and a livelihood, and a family”,任何失业对普通人普通家庭来说都是不易之事,这时更需要ZF部门的作为了。

推及到中国的现状,Public Sector的失业问题就不太存在了,公务员群体基本上很少面临被动的失业问题。
但公共部门的行政效率问题仍需要更多的关注,近年来行政部门也在提倡促进行政效率的提高,然而三公支出仍尾大不掉。
公务员中基层领导队伍也在响应中央号召慢慢缩减,以此来提高行政效率,可行否?
中国特色就是,原本10个副市长,现在剩下6个,其余的4个怎么着也不能沦落到失业的地步吧,不然多损国威。哈哈哈
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-12-6 09:53:48


  Some time ago, complimentary radish, the results, but did not think sweet potatoes are "pilfering." This is really follow-up tragedy caused by the public to the tragedy .
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-12-6 10:01:08
In China, I think it is well known that jobs in Gov't will be stable for ever when CP holds Gov't. Those so called civil servants will never have to worry about being laid off. Gov't revenue increases every year by large margin so that there is enough money to pay those guys. That's why there are so many people are competing for the limited positions offered by Gov't.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-12-6 10:03:02
But every layoff, whether public or private, is a life, and a livelihood, and a family.
就业率对每一个国家来说是社会是否稳定的一个衡量指标,而就业对于每一个人、每一个家庭来说却是真实的生机,这就要求在国家的宏观把握下,个人也应不断提高自己的能力与素质,使得我们能在社会上找到自己的合适岗位
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-12-6 10:37:12
Bad news for those who work in the public sector is almost always good news for those who work in the private sectors.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群