全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 真实世界经济学(含财经时事)
2449 12
2012-05-27

欧元危机呼唤组合动作


As the euro crisis intensifies amid mounting anxieties about a possible Greek departure from the common currency, the clamor grows for initiatives that will decisively shift expectations in the financial markets. The proposed initiatives are of two types: those that harness the power of the European Central Bank, the single institution capable of acting decisively, and those calling for greater burden-sharing by euro-zone governments.

But as the crisis moves closer to its conclusion, it looks increasingly like the two forces will have to be combined to be effective.
The deliberations at Wednesday night's European Union summit suggest most options to increase government burden-sharing are a long way from fruition. That includes the proposal that has received the most attention: euro bonds, in which the euro zone would collectively assume some or all of the debts of individual governments. Even if Germany, Finland and Austria dropped their objections today—a development of which there was little sign on Wednesday night—constitutional changes and other interim steps would mean the first euro bond couldn't be issued for years.

Some analysts say a more explicit signal that the euro zone is heading toward euro bonds, and a road map laying out how, might help bolster confidence, but even most proponents don't see them as a crisis-fighting tool. After the summit, Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, said he would report to the next European summit in late June on "the main building blocks" and on "a working method" to achieve a deeper economic union among euro-zone members. The statement was, said Mujtaba Rahman, an analyst at Eurasia Group in New York, "a creative way of signaling nothing of substance is likely to emerge in June."

Resistance is also strong to other initiatives to combine the euro-zone efforts to share the burden. Talk of a euro-wide deposit-guarantee plan as a way to prevent runs on banks in weak economies has been batted down by Germany. There is a practical issue, too: How effective would euro-zone bank guarantees be for countries at risk of leaving the currency bloc?

"There's a question about whether a euro-zone deposit-guarantee scheme would work to build depositor confidence in a country that might leave the euro zone," said Justin Knight, European interest-rate strategist for UBS in London.Mr. Rahman suggests Wednesday's summit shows governments are still hoping the ECB will dig them out of a hole. "It is still all about the ECB," he said.

But the ECB's main policy "bazookas" have flaws that may undermine their ability to settle the crisis. It could further flood three-year money into banks, through an extension of its Long-Term Refinancing Operations. But while most analysts consider the fund injections in December and February as essential to resolving a crisis of confidence in banks, the benefit to the bond markets of beleaguered governments such as Spain and Italy was short-lived.

There is another obstacle to expanding this program, Mr. Knight points out. To get loans from the central bank, banks need to pledge assets as guarantees. And their pool of eligible assets has shrunk significantly. "Banks in the periphery are running out of eligible collateral. This is where the real shortage is," he said.The ECB can keep lowering the eligibility requirements, but that further concentrates risk on the central bank. Beyond that, the LTRO has also spurred banks in weak economies to buy the bonds of their own governments, intensifying the links between weak banks and weak governments that have been a source of investor anxieties.

The other ECB "bazooka" would be to reactivate purchases of government bonds of Spain and Italy. Many officials say privately that they believe the ECB will do this in a crunch. But there is a big drawback arising from the debt restructuring Greece concluded in March.

The ECB is a major owner of Greek government bonds and refused to take losses as part of the debt restructuring, a position that subordinated the claims of private investors in Greek government bonds. That step makes ECB purchases of bonds of Spain and Italy more hazardous. If the ECB steps in to buy significant quantities of these bonds in an effort to calm markets, officials and analysts say private investors may well pull out. The reason: They fear subordination in the event of a restructuring.

The huge size of government financing requirements in Spain and Italy suggests that keeping private investors in the markets, even if the ECB intervenes, is critical. This could be done, say some officials involved in the discussions, if the euro-zone governments gave an explicit indemnity to the ECB to cover any losses it suffered because of its bond purchases. governments ultimately would suffer losses anyway because they would receive reduced ECB profit distributions or would have to recapitalize the institution. Nonetheless, the explicit indemnity would make the transfers more transparent.)

The other approach is for the euro zone's new bailout fund coming into existence in July—the European Stability Mechanism—to become a bank and be able to borrow from the ECB. That fund could buy bonds in the primary and secondary bond markets, alongside the private sector. As a creditor, it would explicitly rank alongside private investors with no seniority. Some European officials think this is the tidiest solution and one that could be enacted relatively rapidly.

Both solutions would need agreement from the ECB and most euro-zone governments. And that would be likely only in extremis, since both would entail the ostensibly forbidden central-bank finance of governments and raise questions of moral hazard, potentially discouraging beneficiary governments from pushing ahead with economic overhauls
.






EI-BT420_BRUSSE_G_20120524153603.jpg






文章来源:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577424513566902088.html?mod=WSJ_World_MIDDLENews
更多欧债危机:
http://online.wsj.com/public/page/europe-debt.html?mod=WSJ_topnav_europe_europe
因为这篇文章找了一篇欧债的哈:(中文)
http://cn.wsj.com/gb/20120525/rte072241.asp?source=newsletter







了解Follow Us版
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1130480-1-1.html
英文网址,欢迎补充!
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1410923-1-1.html
Follow Us 发帖指南、常见问题及意见征集

https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1131076-1-1.html

关于Follow Us 版面建立官方群
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1212960-1-1.html






图解欧债危机(上)

图解欧债危机(下)


越来越佩服美国的那些经济学家了,真的很牛!


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2012-5-28 12:27:11
每天进步一点
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-5-28 13:44:28
Thanks for sharing!
The most important thing is confidence in euro zone, but what can be made to achieve this and avoid the coming back of worries is still hard to say.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-5-28 14:47:10
谢谢分享
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-5-28 15:15:48
The European debt crisis increasingly fierce because of deep institutional reasons. From the point of the European Union, the euro zone's system design interferes with solving the crisis----the monetary policy and fiscal policy are disunity, the European central bank can't play the role of a lender of last resort like the Fed ;For the domestic system, Europe "to industrialization" lead to their own hematopoietic ability  dropped, the international comparative advantage are  in recession,So the long-term prospects of the European economy is not optimistic.
    I think this is a chance for China , Europe needs development and we need  technology.China's economy just  take the industrial structure change, and depend on consumption development.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-5-28 15:47:42
谢谢分享!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群