我主张在类似的发展中国家，通过工矿企事业（无论内资或外资）对工矿区进行城市化建设，在尊重所在国政权及政治管理的前提下，进行经济管理和社会管理，以此来带动发展中国家欠发达地区的经济发展，实现发展中国家各地区之间的均衡发展。因此，这一城市BOT构想，我也称之为工矿区城市化构想。

I believe that similar developing countries shall allow industrial and mining companies (either domestic or foreign-funded enterprises) to carry out urban construction for industrial and mining regions, and manage the economy and society with full respect for local political authorities and political management. I believe this model can promote economic development of less developed regions of developing countries and realize balanced development of different regions. Therefore, I also call my urban BOT model as urbanization conception for industrial and mining regions.

城市BOT构想，或者称之为工矿区城市化构想，我大致归纳为三个核心点：

The urban BOT model, or urbanization conception for industrial and mining regions, has three core ideas:

（一）地理位置、主体、期限、经济目标

First, geographical locations, main bodies, terms and economic objectives

由大型工矿企业或者有条件的企事业（以下统称工矿企事业），与发展中国家友好平等协商，签订城市BOT经济合作协议，选择在该国欠发达地区大中城市周边辐射地带，以距离该大中城市车程半小时至一小时路程为参考距离，建设工矿区的同时，允许工矿企事业，在一定年限内（30年至50年），以实现该工矿区城市化为目标，建设城市设施、生产生活设施或相关辅助设施，修建与周边大中城市联通的高速公路或城际铁路，组织并开展有关城市化管理等相关事务。

Large-scale industrial and mining companies or other qualified companies (hereinafter referred to as industrial and mining companies) may sign urban BOT economic cooperation agreement with developing countries through friendly and peaceful negotiation. Under such cooperation agreements , within a certain period (30 to 50 years), industrial and mining companies will build urban facilities, production and life facilities or other auxiliary facilities within one hour drive from medium and large-sized cities when they build industrial and mining regions. Meanwhile, industrial and mining companies may build expressways or inter-city railways connected to neighboring medium and large-sized cities. Industrial and mining companies will also be responsible for urban management.

（二）权利、义务和规则

Second, rights, obligations and rules

为保护工矿企事业对工矿区建设、开发的积极性，保持管理政策、经济政策的稳定性，该工矿区在一定年限内（30年至50年），实行有限权利的企政统一管理模式。即工矿企事业被任命为工矿区的一级ZF，在该国ZF 的监督下，行使管理该工矿区城市的经济管理、社会管理权限，同时接受所在国ZF及国家政权对工矿区城市政治权利的管辖。期限截止后，工矿企事业也即工矿区 城市ZF须将经济管理、社会管理权限移交给上级ZF，从而恢复为所在国ZF统一管理模式。

To encourage industrial and mining companies to construct and develop industrial and mining regions and maintain consistency in management and economic policies, such industrial and mining regions may, within a certain period (30 to 50 years), apply management model where enterprises also function as administrators with limited rights, which means that the industrial and mining companies may be appointed as governments for industrial and mining regions. Under local national governments’ supervision, such industrial and mining companies may take responsibility for economic management and social management of such industrial and mining regions, and local national governments will take responsibility for political right management in such industrial and mining regions. Upon expiration of such industrial and mining companies’ appointment, they may transfer the economic management and social management rights to superior governments, so that the unified management of the local government is restored.

（三）税收补偿的激励措施

Third, incentive measures in forms of tax benefits

为鼓励工矿企事业进行工矿区城市化建设的积极性，也为补充工矿企事业进行城市化建设所需资金，建议将工矿城市内形成的税收按照一定的比例返还给工矿企事业。

In order to encourage industrial and mining companies to actively participate in urban construction of industrial and mining regions and supplement the funds needed for urban construction, it is suggested that industrial and mining companies should get refunds on part of the taxes which are collected from industrial and mining regions.

上述描述不足以完全描绘城市BOT模式或者工矿区城市化这一构想的全部内容，但它基本上可以确立一个基本框架，更进一步的构想和细化工作有待在实践中进一步探索和协商。

The above description is not enough to fully depict the urban BOT model or the whole concept of urbanization of industrial and mining regions, but can serve as a basic framework. In-depth concept and details of the model shall be further explored and consulted over amid practices.

问题的关键并不在于这一构想如何进一步的细化，而在于这一构想能否被全世界经济学家、政治学家、社会学家、人类学家认可和接受，是否有意愿为这一构想进一步的细化和实践进行探索。

The key issue is not how such conception will be proceeded, but whether it will be recognized and accepted by economists, politicians, sociologists and anthropologists in the world, and whether they are willing to explore on details and practicing of the conception.

城市BOT模式或者说工矿区城市化这一构想，对于之前所描述的三个历史事件赋予了更新的历史认识，对于 当前全球经济的均衡发展以及发展中国家地区之间的均衡发展也提供了一条可供思索的路径，对于人类历史的未来，更主张以和平而非暴力的方式寻求变革创新的动 力。正因为如此，我个人认为，这一构想将对发展中国家的发展、对世界经济的发展以及人类社会的发展产生积极作用。

The urban BOT model, or urbanization of industrial and mining regions, will give new historical meaning to the abovementioned three historical incidents, and will provide an option for global balanced development and balanced development of developing countries. This model can also provide new momentum for peaceful and nonviolent methods of seeking reform and innovation. Therefore, I personally believe this conception will make positive contribution to development of developing countries, world economy and human society.

因此，我想向全世界经济学家、政治学家、社会学家、人类学家发出倡议，希望我们共同来探索和思考这一构想的可行性和具体行动方案，为这一构想在全世界的实践、为发展中国家的均衡发展、为这个星球的和平与共同繁荣贡献我们的力量！

Therefore, I would like to suggest economists, politicians, sociologists and anthropologists in the world to jointly explore and reflect on feasibility and specific action plan for this conception, and pay efforts to realization of this conception in the world, balanced development of developing countries and peace and joint prosperity of the planet!

在这封公开信结束前，我想用一个中国古老的历史典故“和氏璧”的故事来表明这一构想的历史和现实意义。

Before conclusion of this open letter, I would like to show the conception’s historical and actual meaning through an ancient story in China.

在大约2000多年前中国古代（春秋时期），南方的楚国有一个叫卞和的琢玉工匠，在荆山里得到一块璞玉。卞和捧着璞玉去见当时楚国的君王，楚厉王，厉王命宫廷玉工查看，宫廷玉工说这只是一块石头，厉王大怒，以欺君之罪砍下卞和的左脚。厉王死，另一位君王----武王即位，卞和再次捧着璞玉去见武王，武王又命玉工查看，玉工仍然说只是一块石头，卞和因此 又失去了右脚。武王死，文王即位，卞和抱着璞玉在楚山下痛哭了三天三夜，眼泪流干了，接着流出来的是血。文王得知后派人询问为何哭泣，卞和说：我并不是哭 我被砍去了双脚，而是哭宝玉被当成了石头，忠贞之人被当成了欺君之徒，无罪而受刑辱。于是，文王命人剖开这块璞玉，果真是稀世之玉，于是命名为和氏璧。

About 2000 years ago in Chunqiu period in China, a jade craftsman named BianHe in the south Chu country found an uncut jade in the mountains. He contributed the uncut jade to Li King of Chu country. However, Li King’s royal craftsman said the uncut jade was counterfeit and was only a stone. Li King was very angry, and he cut off left food of BianHe. After Li King’s death, BianHe held the uncut jade to contribute to Wu King, the successor of Li King. However, the king’s royal craftsman said again it was only a stone. Wu King was angry and cut off Bian He’s right foot. Years later, Wu King was dead and Wen King succeeded. BianHe held the uncut jade and cried for three days. In the end, he had no tears but blood to shed. Wen King sent a person to ask him why he cried. BianHe said “I was not crying for my feet being cut. I was sad that a jade was treated as a stone, that an honest man was treated as a cheater and that an innocent man was punished so severely.” Therefore, Wen King ordered people to cut the uncut jade, and it turned out that it was a real rare jade. Wen King named the jade as Heshibi.

感谢您阅读此信！再一次向全世界的经济学家、政治学家、社会学家、人类学家致敬！

Thanks for reading this letter! And I would like to pay tribute again to economists, politicians, sociologists and anthropologists in the world!





如果您有任何感想或问题，均可以给我来信，EMAIL：botcity@yahoo.cn,我期待与您的交流。

If you have any thoughts or questions, please send a mail to me at botcity@yahoo.cn, and I look forward to exchanging ideas with you.



一位普通的中国人：华和章

2012年9月12日

An ordinary Chinese: Hua Hezhang

September 12, 2012

说实话，我觉得废话挺多的

英语还行，呵呵

“关于城市BOT模式的构想与探索的倡议信”的分析

该作者是个“有为”的人，就像很多中国农村的县乡政府领导，突然来个灵感，就准备把本县或本乡建设成××基地等，让农民把刚种的水果树砍了，统一大规模种植由县或乡领导组织来的某农作物。
但是，3年后该项目往往以失败告终，而县乡领导由于组织销售种苗赚了一笔。而去年被砍原来可以有收成的农民果树，以及今天种植失败的成本，统统由农民买单，结果是领导赚一票，可能是100万，可是农民因此损失5000万。这就是很多地方曾经风靡的政府领导在农村的理想规划故事。
该文作者的思路就是以前这些县乡政府领导理想规划的翻版。
其实，我们活在世上，不是要GDP达到5000000美元/年，也不是要建设几个像上海北京一样有高楼大厦的城市，更不是要造多少原子弹。为了生产而生产，我国在毛泽东时代已经试验过，“大炼钢铁”，把农村家家户户的铁锅全拿去熔化成铁块，以便钢铁产量超过英美，争个第一。那个时代，饿死了很多人，生活在那些时代的中国人，他们幸福吗？不幸福。
人活着的目的为了什么？人活着的目的就是为了活着，为了幸福地活着。这才是人活着的目的。
作者通过BOT方式建设城市，这些建设起来的城市（财富），难道是工矿资本家出钱投资建设起来的吗？不是，资本家投进去100万，等城市（财富）建设成了，这些财富已经达到100亿亿亿亿元时，超过100万的财富是哪里来的呢？是靠这个城市的广大民众每天干出来的，是他们一天一天的劳动凝结而成的财富。可是他们会幸福吗？就像我们现在的中国，每个中国人每天加班的干，每天18小时的干（像富士康工人，像华为工人以及中国大地上千千万万家单位里工作的工人），我们的GDP总量已经排名世界第二，可是我们中国人幸福吗？不幸福。众多民众买不起房，小孩上不起学，有病看不起病，大量白领过劳死。到60岁退休了，有人告诉你，你的养老金不够，请再干10年，延迟退休。
想明白人活着为了什么，就能很好地明白作者的“设想”是否是个好设想。如果把民众只当做奴隶，当做创造财富的奴隶，那么，政府这样做，从财富获得者角度说，是个好设想。可是从各大民众的角度说，就是一个十恶不赦的“坏设想”。

请给个答复。