MV-GARCH, BEKK - Estimation by BFGS
Convergence in 87 Iterations. Final criterion was 0.0000071 <= 0.0000100
Usable Observations 714
Log Likelihood 6419.4217
Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat Signif
******************************************************************
1. CNY{10} 0.455868195 0.038238175 11.92181 0.00000000
2. JPY{10} -0.004505214 0.011056256 -0.40748 0.68365480
3. Constant -0.000087543 0.000050340 -1.73902 0.08203192
4. CNY{10} 0.304470434 0.096197354 3.16506 0.00155051
5. JPY{10} 0.017792350 0.035597059 0.49983 0.61719731
6. Constant 0.000143211 0.000191873 0.74639 0.45543439
7. C(1,1) 0.000247156 0.000489135 0.50529 0.61335282
8. C(2,1) -0.002138493 0.004552788 -0.46971 0.63856170
9. C(2,2) 0.004045217 0.002353633 1.71871 0.08566683
10. A(1,1) 0.499627452 0.053063078 9.41573 0.00000000
11. A(1,2) 0.121243255 0.142840425 0.84880 0.39599141
12. A(2,1) -0.017431846 0.014134205 -1.23331 0.21746040
13. A(2,2) 0.297540442 0.076876361 3.87038 0.00010867
14. B(1,1) 0.866961091 0.040944541 21.17403 0.00000000
15. B(1,2) 0.499336179 0.224464790 2.22456 0.02611056
16. B(2,1) -0.067472590 0.051932544 -1.29924 0.19386322
17. B(2,2) 0.070100381 0.174596683 0.40150 0.68805283
*******************************************************************
请问,RATS中A(1,2) 是指1对2的波动溢出效应还是2对1的波动溢出效应?
我看到一些论文将BEKK模型的形式1设定为
而有的论文又将BEKK形式2设定为
这两种形式设定的BEKK形式其参数意义刚好相反,求高人解答!!!
附:我要做一个VAR-BEKK模型,但看到的多数是按形式1设定,但我用RATS估计,现在参数的意义搞混了!
跪求高手解答!!!