全部版块 我的主页
论坛 金融投资论坛 六区 金融学(理论版)
7455 21
2014-07-12
量化投资大师詹姆斯·西蒙斯谈了数学对他的学术前半生和金融后半生的影响。。。并且对于佩雷尔曼(Grigoriy Perelman)解决了庞加莱猜想(Poincare Conjecture)但拒绝领取Fields奖发表了他的看法。

量化投资大师詹姆斯·西蒙斯 James Simons 资料汇总帖

他的另两篇采访在这里:
[专题系列] 纽约时报:量化投资大师詹姆斯·西蒙斯 — Seeker, Doer, Giver, Ponderer
专访:量化投资大师詹姆斯·西蒙斯 The Secret World of Jim Simons



Seed Interview: James Simons

September 19, 2006

THE BILLIONAIRE HEDGE FUND MANAGER DISCUSSES THE IMPACT OF MATHEMATICS ON HIS FORMER LIFE IN ACADEMIA AND HIS NEW ONE IN FINANCE.

simons_article.jpg

James Simons is sometimes referred to as ‘Elvis’ within hedge fund circles. He’s the king, and you always know when he’s left the building.

If you haven’t heard of him, it’s because he deliberately maintains a low profile. In Simon’s business, secrecy is the key to abiding success. But, when rumors spread in 2005 that he was starting a new 100 billion hedge fund, people outside of his field also began to take notice of him.

Before becoming one of the top money managers in the world, Simons was a decorated mathematician. His work was primarily in geometry, peripherally related to the Poincare conjecture, which Grisha Perelman recently won a Fields Medal for solving. Simons’ work on differential geometry, which he did in collaboration with S. S. Chern, has proved useful to string theorists.

Simons is also a generous philanthropist. He has donated significantly to math education, universities, and plans to give over 130 million in the next few years to the study of the genetic basis of autism. He also recently gave 13 million to keep the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory running when the Department of Energy announced a funding shortfall this past year.

In early September, I visited his rather spartan offices to talk to him about math, business, and his philanthropy.


When did you first get interested in math? Was there a singular moment, like Einstein and his compass, that turned you on to math?
I was always interested in math,

本帖隐藏的内容

even when I was a very little kid. I don’t know what compass moment Einstein had, but there was rarely a doubt in my mind that I would do anything except mathematics. There was a brief period I thought I might like to be a Rabbi, but it fortunately came and went. When I went to MIT, that’s all I wanted to study, and that’s basically all I did study, except I took some literature courses which I enjoyed, but basically I just wanted to learn math and prove theorems. I liked to prove theorems.

How do you select people for your company?
We look for people who have demonstrated the ability to do first-class research. We are not a teaching organization. We are a research organization. We hire people to make mathematical models of the markets in which we invest. We look for people who have had success, typically academically, although some people come out of an industrial laboratory like IBM or Bell Labs. Most come out of academia. They’ve had three to five years, written a few papers, and already have some kind of reputation. First and foremost, we look for people capable of doing good science, on the research side, or they are excellent computer scientists in architecting good programs. We have very high standards and it works. Our business is wonderful as a result.

Is there a difference between people with math backgrounds and science backgrounds who work for you?
Yes, but we need both in our business. Some of the work is purely mathematical, like designing better ways to develop algorithms of one sort or another, or to maximize some utility function. Some of the work is really scientific. It’s looking at a lot of data and really looking for what underlies that data. In that sense, it is kind of like astronomy. You look at a lot of data from up in the sky, you bring it down, and it’s quite dirty and you have to clean it to get rid of outliers or one thing or another. Then you hope you can analyze that data in a way that makes sense of whatever hypothesis or set of hypotheses you may have about what you are looking at. That’s a big piece of what we do. There we hire people who are experimental physicists or astronomers.

How scientific is it? Do you actually use models from science?
The approach is scientific. Scientific sophistication is important. Do we directly apply the Navier-Stokes equation? No. Brownian Motion is something that has a better chance of being applied. Brownian motion is a way of looking at data and ordering random activity, or activity that looks random. Models like that, and approaches like that are very useful. Some stuff comes out of math and physics, especially math where various optimization techniques are used. It’s more the sense and sophistication of doing science. We use very rigorous statistical approaches to determine what we think is underlying a phenomenon and really do explain that part of it. But it’s not like proving theorems.


How much of your success is pure luck and how much is the math, science, and minds?
Let’s suppose you have a coin that is 70/30 heads. Well, if you get to bet heads, you are going to win 7 times out of 10. Three times out ten you are going to lose, and that’s bad luck. So you need a measure of good luck to avoid a long run of tails when you have a 70/30 coin that’s heads. At a certain point the luck evens out. Of course there’s luck in our business, but so far we’ve had a nice edge.


Do you stay up to date with the mathematics community or the research you support?
I don’t keep up with all the research we support. How could I? Sometimes it’s not math, it’s physics or whatever. I certainly haven’t kept up with my own field adequately. I pay a little bit of attention, but not much depth anymore. I tinker around. Sometimes something comes out of it, most of the time it doesn’t, but I like the tinkering. I’m tinkiering around with something right now that might get somewhere. In fact, I think it will. But, if you really get into it, it’s consuming. So it’s difficult to run a business and be so consumed with another passion. On the other hand, I’ll retire in a few years, and I suppose I’ll get re-consumed.


Have you ever regretted leaving math? Do you ever think you could have done something huge? When you won the Veblen Prize, you received it the same year as legendary mathematician William Thurston.
First of all, I was in the same category as Thurston merely because he and I stood together on a stage. That did not necessarily make me his intellectual peer. Second of all, some of the work that I did has ended up being very useful in physics and mathematics. The work I did with Chern and Cheeger. I had my little impact on the field, and I am quite happy about that. Do I regret it? No. I miss certain aspects of it. I miss the more relaxed tone of things, the constant intellectual stimulation of just being with very bright people all the time. Now we have a lot of very bright people in our company, so I get some of that. Academics has its charms, but it doesn’t have enough charms that I regret leaving that field. I’m happy with the decision I made. Everything is to some extent a compromise. Not everything can be perfect.


Do you ever get asked to explain Chern-Simons theory?
All the time, by potential investors.


Ever get any of it across to them?
Never. I don’t even try.


What do you think of the physicists taking your theories and using them?
I think it’s wonderful. Are you kidding? It’s always nice to see your work picked up by someone else and carried on.


You were on CNN⎯do you have any desire to be more public for your programs?
I was on Lou Dobbs for about a microsecond. He was doing a piece on teaching, and they interviewed a number of folks. But I’ve never been on TV in any meaningful way. And I don’t really have a desire for that. There’s a wonderful quote in Animal Farm. The source of all wisdom in that book is Benjamin the donkey. He observes at one point that “God gave me a tail to keep off the flies. But I’d rather of had no tail and no flies.” So, that’s kind of the way I feel about publicity.


What do you think about Grisha Perelman turning down the Fields Medal?
Well the articles said he was the first person to do it, but I don’t think he was. I think Grothendieck turned it down, maybe 30 years ago or so [Editor’s note: Grothendieck did in fact boycott his Fields Medal to protest the Soviet military incursions in Eastern Europe in 1966].

I met [Perelman]. In fact, he came and had lunch in our offices on Long Island, and I had some sense of the course of that work. I think it’s wonderful. He did a great job. Hamilton had started in a certain direction, which seemed like a very rational and reasonable direction. Thurston did his big piece, showing how everything could fit together. And then Perelman did his. Turning the medal down, well, I wouldn’t have done it. I never turn down anything.







二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2014-7-12 07:55:53
我发过的部分帖子:

【压箱底系列】

【压箱底系列】Commodity Price Dynamics: A Structural Approach (2012)
【压箱底系列】关于金融泡沫:Money Mania (2014)
【压箱底系列】Bull: A History of the Boom and Bust, 1982-2004
【压箱底系列】Your Money and Your Brain (2007)
【压箱底系列】The Worldly Philosophers (1999, 7th Edition)
【压箱底系列】揭秘全球对冲基金业史上最大破产案内幕:Hedge Hogs (2013)

【压箱底系列】美国FDIC(联邦存款保险公司)前主席Blair回忆录《Bull by the Horns》
【压箱底系列】美国前财长盖特纳回忆录《压力测试》(Geithner: Stress Test)免费

【压箱底系列】House of Debt (Mian and Sufi, 2014)
【压箱底系列】美国债务危机:White House Burning
【压箱底系列】终局:看懂全球债务危机 Endgame: The End of the Debt Supercycle
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:The Enigma of Capital (2011)
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:I.O.U. Why Everyone Owes Everyone and No One Can
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:All the Devils are Here (2011)
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:Predator Nation (《监守自盗》导演Ferguson,2013)
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:The End of Wall Street (2010)
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:House of Cards (2009)
【压箱底系列】08金融危机必读:More Mortgage Meltdown (2009)

【压箱底系列】最经典金融入门书:A Random Walk Down Wall Street (2011)
【压箱底系列】最经典投资入门书:Common Sense on Mutual Funds, John Bogle (2010)
【压箱底系列】独特的逆向投资法:The Art of Contrarian Trading
【压箱底系列】指数投资新发现 The Fundamental Index: A Better Way to Invest
【压箱底系列】行为金融与投资相结合的经典:The Behavior Gap (2012)
【压箱底系列】经典投资入门书:The Neatest Little Guide to Stock Market Investing
【压箱底系列】最新高频交易畅销书《Flash Boys》免费!高频交易背景资料 持续更新!
【压箱底系列】经典高频交易(High Frequency Trading)入门书:暗池 (Dark Pools)

【压箱底系列】国际经济大牛Barry Eichengreen英语原版书:Capital Flows and Crises
【压箱底系列】经典随机矩阵理论入门书:Random Matrices (Mehta, 3rd edition)
【压箱底系列】经典随机矩阵理论入门书:An Introduction to Random Matrices
【压箱底系列】最新能源衍生品教材:Quantitative Energy Finance (2014)
【压箱底系列】经典大数据入门书 Uncharted: Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture
【压箱底系列】How Numbers Rule the World (2014)
【压箱底系列】Wavelet Neural Networks (2014)

[专题系列]
[原创] 浅析动量因子(附带Matlab/SAS程序及经典文献85篇,全部免费)
[专题系列] ECB 终于把名义利率降为负值了!(附重要文献11篇,免费)
[专题系列] IMF: 浮动汇率,国际资本,与信贷增长的关系 (最新文献4篇,免费)
[专题系列] Frameworks for Central Banking in the Next Century(最新文献9篇,免费)
[专题系列] Energy Derivatives Pricing (能源衍生品定价介绍,27篇文献,全部免费)
[专题系列] 福布斯杂志(Forbes)揭秘世界知名对冲基金AQR制胜交易策略!附带29篇文献
[专题系列] 纽约时报:量化投资大师詹姆斯·西蒙斯 — Seeker, Doer, Giver, Ponderer

[专题系列] 诺奖得主Robert Shiller:人们买房时考虑些什么?

[专题系列] 神秘人陆奇:微软华人高管的窘境与破局

[专题系列] 美知名杂志《名利场》独家披露:苹果vs.三星-智能手机专利之争细节!

[专题系列] 有效市场假设(Efficient Market Hypothesis) :一场伟大的分歧!
[专题系列] 金融学大牛John Campbell:Empirical Asset Pricing 附带10篇经典文献
[专题系列] 金融危机后,通胀目标(Inflation Targeting)是否仍然可行?
[专题系列] 非常规货币政策退出策略(Exit Strategy) 权威报告!
[专题系列] The Price of Political Uncertainty (最新文献4篇,免费)
[专题系列] 回测过程中的过度拟合问题 (backtest overfitting,附最新文献2篇)

[专题系列] 做计量的朋友们,你们的标准误差(standard error)算对了吗?(附程序)




二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-7-12 08:09:55
这个我肯定要看看的
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-7-12 08:19:29
kankan
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-7-12 08:39:12
seesee
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-7-13 11:08:53
数学,对交易的重要性
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群