2014
The Right(s) to Water
The Multi-Level Governance of a Unique Human Right
Authors: Pierre Thielbörger
A complete monograph devoted to the right to water
A comprehensive, consistent and in-depth analysis of the legal consequences and political impact of the development and establishment of the right to water through the lens of a single author
An innovative theoretical frame within which to understand the debate on the human right to water, and the relationship of human rights with national and regional rights
Examines all possible philosophical and conceptual objections to the right
Politicians and diplomats have for many years proclaimed a human right to water as a solution to the global water crisis, most recently in the 2010 the UN General Assembly Resolution “The human right to water and sanitation”. To what extent, however, can a right to water legally and philosophically exist and what difference to international law and politics can it make? This question lies at the heart of this book. The book’s answer is to argue that a right to water exists under international law but in a more differentiated and multi-level manner than previously recognised. Rather than existing as a singular and comprehensive right, the right to water should be understood as a composite right of different layers, both deriving from separate rights to health, life and an adequate standard of living, and supported by an array of regional and national rights. The author also examines the right at a conceptual level. After disproving some of the theoretical objections to the category of socio-economic rights generally and the concept of a right to water more specifically, the manuscript develops an innovative approach towards the interplay of different rights to water among different legal orders. The book argues for an approach to human rights – including the right to water – as international minimum standards, using the right to water as a model case to demonstrate how multilevel human rights protection can function effectively. The book also addresses a crucial last question: how does one make an international right to water meaningful in practice? The manuscript identifies three crucial criteria in order to strengthen such a composite derived right in practice: independent monitoring; enforcement towards the private sector; and international realization. The author examines to what extent these criteria are currently adhered to, and suggests practical ways of how they could be better met in the future.
Content Level » Research
Keywords » Global Water Crisis - Human Right to Water - International Water Obligations - Right to Water - Safe Water
Related subjects » Development Economics - International, Foreign and Comparative Law - Political Science - Water Policy, Governance, and Management
Contents
1 Introduction ........................................... 1
References . . . . . . . ...................................... 7
2 The Current Legal Status of the Right to Water ................ 9
2.1 The Right to Water in Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1.1 The Right to Water in National Law of European States . . . 9
2.1.1.1 The Right to Water in Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.1.1.2 The Right to Water in Belgium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.1.1.3 The Right to Water in France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.1.1.4 Comparison of the Three European Approaches . . . 30
2.1.2 The Right to Water in European Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.1.2.1 The Right to Water in the Law of the European
Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.1.2.2 The Right to Water in the ECHR and the ESC . . . 36
2.1.3 Conclusion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.2 The Right to Water Outside of Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.2.1 The Right to Water in South African Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.2.1.1 Protection of the Right to Water through
South African Legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.2.1.2 Protection of the Right to Water through
South African Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2.2.1.3 Analysis of the Protection of the Right to Water
in South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.2.2 The Right to Water in Indian Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.2.2.1 The Protection of the Right to Water through
Indian Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.2.2.2 The Protection of the Right to Water through
Indian Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2.2.2.3 Analysis of the Protection of the Right to Water
in India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.2.3 Comparative Analysis of the South African and Indian
Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
xiii2.3 A Human Right to Water in International Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
2.3.1 Protection of the Right through International
Conventions and Treaties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.3.2 Interpretations of Treaties through Courts and
Quasi-Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
2.3.2.1 General Decisions of International Courts and
Quasi-Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
2.3.2.2 General Comment No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
2.3.3 Protection of the Right to Water through International
Custom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
2.3.3.1 Millennium Development Goal Number 7 . . . . . . 77
2.3.3.2 The UNGA Resolution on “The Human Right
to Water and Sanitation” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
2.3.3.3 The HRC Resolution “Human Rights and Access
to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation” . . . . . . . . 82
2.3.3.4 Renewal of the Mandate of the Independent Expert
as Special Rapporteur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
2.3.3.5 Assessment of the Current Situation . . . . . . . . . . 84
2.3.4 Protection of a Human Right to Water through General
Principles of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
2.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3 Philosophical and Conceptual Approaches to a Human
Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.1 The “Water” Element of the Term “Human Right to Water” . . . . . 96
3.1.1 Objection: We Cannot Hold a Right to a Tangible Thing . . . 96
3.1.2 Objection: The Time to Accept Water as a Right
Is Not “Now” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
3.1.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
3.2 The “Right” Element of the Term “Human Right to Water” . . . . . 98
3.2.1 The Concept of a Right . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
3.2.2 Objection: We Cannot Accept a Right Without Choice . . . 99
3.2.3 Objection: There Is No Added Value of a Right to Water . . . 100
3.2.4 Objection: There Cannot Be a Right, if it Cannot
Be Enforced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
3.2.5 Objection: We Cannot Accept Rights Whose Realization
Is “Impossible” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
3.2.6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
3.3 The “Human” Element of the Term “Human Right to Water” . . . . 105
3.3.1 The Identifiable Schools of Human Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
3.3.2 Water as a Human Right According to the
Different Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
xiv Contents3.4 The Shape of a Right to Water: Combining
Existing Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
3.4.1 A Self-Standing Right or a Derived Right? . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3.4.2 Deriving from What? Plea for a More
Integrated Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
3.4.2.1 Antiquated Understanding of the Right to Life . . . . 115
3.4.2.2 Over-Categorization of Rights as Either
Civil–Political or Socio-Economic . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
3.4.2.3 False Fear of Creating Unforeseeable State
Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
3.4.2.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
3.4.3 Contouring the Right: Water and Sanitation—One or
Two Rights? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
3.4.4 Different Legal Levels of Protection—Relationship
of Constitutional Rights to Water and a Human
Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
3.4.4.1 The Relationship of Different Legal Orders
After the Kadi-Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
3.4.4.2 National Level of Protection Exceeding
International Level of Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
3.4.4.3 International Level of Protection Exceeding
National Level Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
3.4.4.4 Avoiding the Dilemma: Human Rights
as Minimum, Not Uniform Standards . . . . . . . . . 129
3.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
4 Implementation: Independent Monitoring, Enforcement Against
the Private Sector, and International Realization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
4.1 Independent Monitoring: The Case of the UN Special Rapporteur
on the Human Right to Water and Sanitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
4.1.1 The Monitoring Role of Experts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
4.1.2 Analysis of the Mandate’s Undertaken Monitoring Efforts . . . 138
4.1.2.1 Country Visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
4.1.2.2 Issues in Focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
4.1.3 Conclusion and Remaining Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
4.2 Enforcing the Right in the Private Sector: The Case of Water
Privatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
4.2.1 Preface: Conceptual Problems with the Right to Water
and Privatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
4.2.1.1 Market Principles Incompatible with Services
to Fulfill Basic Needs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
4.2.1.2 Non-existence of Competitive Water Markets? . . . . 148
4.2.1.3 Water as a Non-private Good? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Contents xv4.2.1.4 Current Dynamics of Supply and Demand:
Increasing Water Prices? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
4.2.1.5 Conclusion: Compatibility of the Right
to Water and Privatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
4.2.2 Case Studies: The ICSID-Jurisdiction
on Water Privatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.2.2.1 Compania de Aguas de Aconquija
v. Argentine Republic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.2.2.2 Azurix Corporation v. Argentine Republic . . . . . . 155
4.2.2.3 Aguas del Tunari v. Republic of Bolivia . . . . . . . 158
4.2.3 The Right to Water as Solution for Challenges
of Water Privatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
4.2.3.1 Consideration of the Right to Water in the
Concession Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
4.2.3.2 Requirement of Monitoring and Control . . . . . . . 164
4.2.3.3 Inclusion of Procedural Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
4.2.3.4 The Right to Water as Mandatory Component
of Judicial Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
4.2.4 Conclusion and Remaining Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
4.3 Realization by International Means: The Case of International
Obligations Deriving from a Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
4.3.1 International Water Obligations: The Philosophical
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
4.3.1.1 A Liability Model Approach to the International
Obligation to Fulfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
4.3.1.2 Some Kantian and Consequentialist
Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
4.3.1.3 Rawlsian-Influenced Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
4.3.1.4 A Water-Specific Approach to International Water
Assistance: Hugo Grotius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
4.3.1.5 The Idea of Common Ownership of the Earth . . . . 175
4.3.1.6 Conclusion: A Compelling Philosophical
Case for International Water Assistance? . . . . . . . 176
4.3.2 International Water Assistance: Existing
Legal Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
4.3.2.1 International Obligations in Human Rights
Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
4.3.2.2 Assessment of Existing International Water
Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
4.3.3 International Water Obligations Under an Accepted
Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
4.3.3.1 International Obligations to Respect the Human
Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
4.3.3.2 International Duties to Protect the Human Right to
Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
4.3.3.3 International Obligations to Fulfill the Human
Right to Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
xvi Contents4.4 Conclusion and Remaining Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
4.4.1 Necessary Consent of Host State for International
Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
4.4.2 The Problem of “Conditionality” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
4.4.3 Conditions of Withdrawal and Suspension of International
Water Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
List of Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231