全部版块 我的主页
论坛 新商科论坛 四区(原工商管理论坛) 商学院 管理科学与工程
4907 35
2015-08-04
【2014】Financialization, New Investment Funds, and Labour: An International Comparison
Financialization
Book 图书名称: Financialization, New Investment Funds, and Labour: An International Comparison
Author 作者:    Howard Gospel, Andrew Pendleton, Sigurt Vitols
Publisher 出版社: Oxford University Press
Page 页数: 416
Publishing Date 出版时间: Apr 1, 2014                        
Language 语言: English
Size 大小: 1 MB
Format 格式: pdf 文字版
ISBN: 0199653585, 9780199653584
Edition: 第1版 搜索过论坛,没有该文档


The book provides a comprehensive, comparative treatment of the development of New Investment Funds (NIFs)--private equity, hedge funds, and sovereign wealth funds--and their impact upon labour and employment. Several countries are selected for in-depth treatment with a chapter devoted to each: US, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Poland, and Japan. The book examines variations in the level and type of fund activity between countries, considers influences upon these variations, and analyses differences in the impact of these funds on labour and employment. This analysis is located in a broader discussion of the nature and development of corporate financialization and comparative capitalism. Financialization has supported the development and growth of these funds, and many aspects of these funds exemplify the process of financialization.

Each chapter reports the evidence on the impact of these funds on labour and employment. Case studies conducted by the authors supplement other evidence. Much of the evidence shows that private equity funds can have adverse effects on labour, such as reductions in employment, but there is also evidence of more positive effects in some cases such as employment growth and adoption of high commitment human resource practices. There is much less evidence on the effects of activist HFs and SWFs, with the impact on labour typically being indirect.

Between them, the chapters show that variations in national regulation have a significant impact on both the development of fund activities and their effects. With regard to labour effects, employment and labour regulations do not seem to be of prime importance in explaining the level of fund activity, but regulation supporting worker consultation and voice affects the capacity of labour representatives to influence the outcomes of fund activity on labour and employment.


== Table of contents ==
n/a


== 回帖见免费下载 ==


声明: 本资源仅供学术研究参考之用,发布者不负任何法律责任,敬请下载者支持购买正版。
提倡免费分享! 我发全部免费的,分文不收 来看看 ...
你也可关注我  马上加关注

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2015-8-4 09:14:58
谢谢分享~~~
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2015-8-4 09:21:04
谢谢分享好书!!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2015-8-4 09:21:30
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2015-8-4 09:27:00
Financialization, New Investment Funds, and Labour: An International Comparison
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2015-8-4 09:27:37
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群