全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 微观经济学
3490 6
2009-03-23

也不知道新人发帖这样合不合规矩……

刚开始学微观经济……实在是对题目无力……老师都是说了原理也不举例子就直接要我们做作业……

求高人指点……

哪怕只是说思路也好……

谢谢……

15. Japanese rice producers have extremely high production costs, in part due to the high opportunity cost of land and to their inability to take advantage of economies of large-scale production. Analyze two policies intended to maintain Japanese rice production:⑴a per-pound subsidy to farmers for each pound of rice produced, or ⑵a per-pound tariff on imported rice. Illustrate with supply-and-demand diagrams the equilibrium price and quantity, domestic rice production, government revenue or deficit, and deadweight loss from each policy. Which policy is the Japanese government likely to prefer? Which policy are Japanese farmers likely to prefer?

16. In 1983 the Reagan administration introduced a new agricultural program called the Payment-in-Kind Program(实物方案). To examine how the program worked, let’s consider the wheat market. ⑴Suppose the demand function is Qd=28-2P and the supply function is Qs=4+4P. Find the free-market equilibrium price and quantity.

⑵Now suppose the government wants to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. However, the payment is made in wheat rather than in dollars——hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government’s vast reserves that resulted from previous price support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equal to the amount that could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is now produced by farmers? How much is indirectly supplied to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?

⑶Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, it would have stored or destroyed it. Do taxpayers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program create?

17. About 100 million pounds of jelly beans are consumed in the United States each year, and the price has been about 50 cents per pound. However, jelly bean producers feel that their incomes are too low, and they have convinced the government that price supports are in order. The government will therefore buy up as many jelly beans as necessary to keep the price at $1 per pound. However, government economists are worried about the impact of this program, because they have no estimates of the elasticities of jelly bean demand or supply.

⑴Could this program cost the government more than $50 million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost less than $50 million per year? Under what conditions? Illustrate with a diagram. ⑵Could this program cost consumers(in terms of lost consumer surplus) more than $50 million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost consumers less than $50 million per year? Under what conditions? Again, use a diagram to illustrate.

19. Among the tax proposals regularly considered by Congress is an additional tax on distilled liquors. The tax would not apply to beer. The own-price elasticity of supply of liquor is 4, and the own-price elasticity of demand is -0.2. The cross-elasticity of demand for beer with respect to the price of liquor is 0.1.

⑴If the new tax is imposed, who will bear the greater burden, liquor suppliers or liquor consumers? Why? ⑵How will the new tax affect the beer market, assuming that beer supply is infinitely elastic?

20. The domestic supply and demand curves for hula beans are as follows:

Demand: P=200-2Q; Supply: P=50+Q.

Where P is the price in cents per pound, and Q is the quantity in millions of pounds. We area small country in the world hula bean market, where the current price(which will not be affected by anything we do) is 60 cents per pound. Congress is considering a tariff of 40 cents per pound. Find the domestic price of hula beans that will result if the tariff is imposed. Also compute the dollar gain or loss to domestic consumers, domestic producers, and government revenue from the tariff.

21. You know that the demand for automobiles is characterized by a stock adjustment process. Suppose a special 20 percent sales tax is suddenly imposed on automobiles. Will the share of the tax paid by consumers rise, fall, or stay the same over time? Explain briefly. Repeat for a 50-cents-per-gallon gasoline tax.

25.假设某产品的市场如下:

Qs=2P, Qd=300-P

⑴求其均衡价格和数量。

⑵假设对买者征收T元的单位税。求卖者得到的价格、买者支付的价格和交易量。

⑶求作为T的函数的税收收入,并画出T在0至300间的这种关系图。

⑷求作为T的函数的税收所导致的无谓损失,并画出T在0至300间的这种关系图。

⑸政府对该产品征收200元的税的政策是好政策吗?为什么?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2009-3-23 13:42:00

25,(1)Qs=Qd

(2)Ps=Pd+T,继续第一问。

(3)税收收入=TQd,Qd大于等于0.P的最低价格是0.

(4)无谓损失就是那个三角形,征税后需求减少,实际需求对应的需求量和供给量相等,之后是减少的三角形。画图可知。

(5)评价政策的好坏,经常使用消费者剩余和生产者剩余以及税收收入三者之和是增加还是减少为标准。

21,汽车的销售依赖于存货,假设对汽车征收20%的特别比例税,那么对于消费者的税收负担是增加还是减少?还是不变?如果是50美分每加伦的从量税,上述问题该怎么回答??

  如果有汽车的需求曲线就好了,就比较好分析。如果对汽车的需求曲线是一条垂直线,那么消费者全部承担税负,这是以从量税为准。对于从价税,会使消费者的需求曲线的斜率发生改变,斜率可能变得陡峭了,这样消费者的需求曲线更加的缺乏弹性,承担的税负可能更大。

仅供参考

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2009-3-23 13:59:00

21,国内呼啦豆的需求函数和供给函数如下

P=200-2Q;  P=50+Q.假定本国为小国,即本国的举动不影响世界价格,设p=60.

国会正在考虑征税关税40美分的从量税。如果实施的40美分的从量税,找出国内呼啦豆均衡价格,同时计算国内消费者剩余是的变化。生产者剩余的变化,政府税收的变化。

该题目的算法同25.

19,国会通常对蒸馏酒征附加税而不对啤酒征附加税,烈酒的自价格供给弹性是4,需求的自价格弹性是-0.2.啤酒对烈酒的交叉价格需求弹性是0.1.

求(1)如果新的税收增加了,谁将承担更大税负?是烈酒供给商还是烈酒消费者,为什么?

⑵第一问的税收如果影响啤酒市场?假设啤酒的供给弹性是无限的?

算法同25.

  15、16、17、18都是同样的原理和算法,建议看看平迪克的微观经济学。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2009-3-23 19:42:00

我也是新学的啊,现学现卖,抛砖引玉了啊

15 题 本提考察贸易部分的相关知识。政府为了保护国内的幼稚产业被自由开放的国际贸易所摧毁,一般采用两种手段。第一、关税。第二、补贴。(当然还有配额,不过意同关税)。前者通过对国外进口货物的抽税提高了从国外进口的货物的成本,限制了国外进口的数量,所以从一定程度上保护了国内高成本生产高价格出售货物的卖主,同时关税收入还提高了政府收入。后者,通过对国内卖主的补贴,降低了其生产的成本,一定程度上也保护了卖主的利益,但补贴增加了政府支出,所以如果你是政府,你会选择前者,因为效果一样,但你的收入增加了。至于从国内卖主角度,政府的两种手段都提高稳定了国内市场的均衡价格,可是后者政府的补贴降低了生产者的成本,所以卖主更希望得到政府补贴。其实,两种手段都会造成无谓损失,并且降低了消费者的福利

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2009-3-23 19:48:00

16题是简单的二元方程组问题,把供求两个函数联立求解,即Qd=Qs,得

28-2P=4+4P,求解得 P=4 Qs=Qd=20

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2009-3-23 20:12:00
16(2)首先政府通过给农民20*25%=5数量的小麦的方式使农民实际产量供应减少到20*(1-25%)=15个数量。因为农民可以拿政府补贴的小麦去买,所以市场新的供给量没有变,同时均衡价格亦没变,消费者消费亦无变化。其实整个过程相当于政府给农民5个数量小麦的补贴罢了
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群