全部版块 我的主页
论坛 计量经济学与统计论坛 五区 计量经济学与统计软件
3444 1
2005-09-20

PROCs GENMOD and SURVEYLOGISTIC each have certain useful features that the other one doesn't have. I'm trying to find out which set of capabilities is more important for my data. This question is somewhat moot for me, since I don't have SAS 9, so I can't use PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC. But maybe I can learn something, anyway.

I have data in which many subjects have repeated observations. I am modeling a binary dependent variable, and wanted to use PROC GENMOD for its GEE capabilities. The observations are from direct marketing contacts to try to enroll the subjects into a program. A subject may be contacted several times, but such contacts will cease upon enrollment in the program. The binary dependent variable is for enrollment / non-enrollment. But all of these marketing contacts come from individual campaigns, each with multi-cell design plans. Which is why I was curious about the possibility of applying PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC. I'm not sure whether the effect of the designs is more or less important than the dependence structure of multiple observations per subject. Any advice, ideas, poems, threats, etc. are welcome.

Thanks!

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2005-9-20 10:29:00
There was an interesting article on these issues: Lee, Youngjo; Nelder, John A. (2004). Conditional and marginal models: Another view. Statistical science. 19 219-238. I can't say I fully understood all of the points, but they seem to argue against GEE models generally. I'd be intereted in discussing this with anyone else who has read the article, or other articles on similar issues Peter Peter L. Flom, PhD Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis Core Center for Drug Use and HIV Research National Development and Research Institutes 71 W. 23rd St http://cduhr.ndri.org www.peterflom.com New York, NY 10010 (212) 845-4485 (voice) (917) 438-0894 (fax)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群