全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 经济史与经济思想史
4999 9
2005-10-03

http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/ROME/REPUBLIC.HTM

After the overthrow of the Tarquin monarchy by Junius Brutus in 509 BC, Rome does not revert back to a monarchy for the rest of its history. The era of the great expansion of Roman power and civilization is the era of the Roman Republic, in which Rome is ruled by its Senate and its assembly, which were institutions formed at the beginning of the monarchy. The history of the Republic is a history of continuous warfare; all of the historical stories which the Romans will use as stories of Roman virtue and values date from this tumultuous period of defense and invasion.
The Romans had at the beginning of the Republic a constitution which had laid down the traditions and institutions of government; this constitution, however, was not a formal or even a written document, but rather a series of unwritten traditions and laws. These traditions and laws were based on the institution of a monarchy, so while the Romans did not revive the monarchy, they still invested enormous amounts of power in their officials. At the top were the consuls, who were two patricians elected to the office for one year. These patricians exercised imperium in much the same way the kings had in the Roman monarchy. These consuls initiated legislation, served as the head of the judiciary and the military, and served as chief priests to the nation. They even dressed as monarchs, by wearing purple robes and sitting on the seat traditionally reserved for the monarch: the ivory chair.
However, the power of the consuls were severely limited. First, they only served for one year, at which point they would have to be re-elected or enter into private life again. Second, there were two consuls; either consul could effectively prevent any action or decision by the other consul by simply vetoing him. No consul could act without the other consul in agreement. Third, the consuls would have to serve on the Senate after their term in office; this led them to cultivate assiduously the cooperation of the senate. So the consuls exercised absolute power, imperium , but their power was severely hamstrung by the circumstances of their office. As a result, the consuls did not exercise much initiative or creativity, so Roman government tended to be highly conservative and cautious. This, however, was the intent of the consular system. In 325 BC, however, the consul system was changed to allow for proconsuls, who were consuls whose terms in office were extended because of military campaigns. Beneath the consuls were two financial officers called quaestors, and as the Republic evolved, an officical called the praetor was invented. The praetorship was originally a judicial office, but later became a military office; the praetors were essentially the central generals of Rome. The praetorship, like the consulship, was a one-year appointment, but like the consulship could be extended in times of war. In addition, the task of classifying citizens according to wealth and tax status, which was a consular duty, eventually fell to a new pair of officials called censors. It was the job of the censor to draw up the roll of citizens (somewhat like our modern day census; census is the Latin word from which "censor" is derived) and to fix their tax status. As you might imagine, the censors had all kinds of opportunities for bribery and corruption since they were setting tax rates, so after a while the office fell only to the most incorruptible and virtuous men of the Republic: former consuls. Eventually, the office of the censor acquired great powers, such as the power to dismiss senators from the Senate not merely for financial reasons, but any reason at all. By the time of the late Republic, the censors had become some of the most powerful politicians in Rome.
It is immediately evident that the imperium was fully concentrated in the hands of the patricians. The consuls were elected from the patrician class, as were the quaestors and the praetors; the censors, by definition, were always patricians. Because the consul reverted to the Senate, the Senate, composed only of patricians, became the principle power in Rome. The Republic in its early form was largely a transfer of power from the monarch to the wealthiest classes in Rome, and this dominance of Roman law, finances, and foreign policy by the patricians instantly produced resentment among the plebeians; from its inception in 509 BC to its demise at the hands of Caesar in the middle of the first century BC, the political history of the Roman Republic is a tumultuous, chaotic, and often violent conflict between the two classes in Rome vying for political power.
This conflict was called "the struggle of the orders" (the orders of society) and is largely about the patrician class attempting to hold onto power while the plebeians attempted to achieve social and political equality. The patricians found themselves unable to exist without the plebeians: not only did the plebeians produce the food and supply the labor that kept the Roman economy going, they also supplied the soldiers for the Roman military. If the plebeians could act as a group, they could effectively shut down the Roman economy and military; the latter was especially important since Rome was in continual military conflict during the age of the Republic. In Roman historical tradition, in 494 BC the plebeians withdrew from Rome and occupied the Sacred Mount. There they declared an alternative government. They formed a tribal assembly, modelled after the Roman assembly, which would be headed by tribunes who were heads of their tribes. They declared that these tribunes could veto any decision by a Roman magistrate or official, and could veto any decision or legislation by the Senate. The assembly itself, like the former assembly, voted by tribe, and the decision of the assembly was binding on all plebeians. In other words, the plebeians had won for themselves the right to author their own legislation. Their decisions, however, were not binding on non-plebeians.
In 450 BC, the struggle of the orders produced the Law of the Twelve Tables, which simply formalized and codified Roman law and its constitution. The Romans, however, saw it as a victory for the rights of the citizen for it gave them an instrument to know where they stood as far as the law is concerned. In 445 BC, plebeians acquired the right to marry a patrician, and in 367 the plebeians gained the right to be elected consul, when the first plebeian consul was elected. The Licinian-Sextian laws demanded that at least one consul be a plebeian. After the completion of the term of consular office, the consul became a member of the Senate, so the patrician hold on the Senate had, in part, been broken when the plebeians gained full access to the office of the consul. In 300 BC, plebeians were allowed to serve at all levels of the priesthood, thus making them religiously equal to the patricians. Finally, in the greatest victory of all in terms of power and influence, in 287 BC, the decisions and legislation of the plebeian assembly were not only binding on the plebeians, but on the entire Roman citizenry. These reforms were purchased without any civil war or internal bloodshed; they would not resolve the struggle, but they certainly prevented out and out civil war.
The Romans, then, reformed their government as the need arose rather than pursuing any particular plan of reform or development. At the same time, the Romans built their territorial power with the same lack of planning and purpose. Originally, the wars which the Republic fought were largely defensive wars; the expulsion of the Tarquins provoked many attacks by their allies and by Etruscans. Soon, however, the Romans were moving to gain control over neighboring territory in order to neutralize the threat of attack. Their logic was that control over these territories would obviate any potential attack from the people occupying those territories and at the same time provide a buffer region between themselves and potential attackers. Roman conquest, then, was pursued largely for Roman security; the end result of this process would be, first, the conquest of the entire Italian peninsula by 265 BC, and then the conquest of the world. The Roman Empire was an accident, so to speak; it was formed in the pursuit of other policies, namely, security. Only in its later stages was the Roman Empire a deliberate objective.
Italy is a peninsula jutting out into the Mediterranean west of Greece. Unlike Greece, Italy is poor in mineral resources and surprisingly devoid of useful harbors. However, the most stunning difference between Greece and Italy is the exponentially larger amount of fertile land. While Greece is poor in fertile land, Italy is wealthy in both land and precipitation. So the two peoples developed very differently; the Italians began and remained largely an agrarian people. Even in its latest stages, Roman culture would identify its values and ideals as agrarian. Italy had one other significant difference from Greece: it was easily accessible from Europe to the north. The Greeks lived behind a formidable mountain range; the Alps to the north of Italy were not quite as invulnerable. The Greeks also had a warlike Greek population to the north, the Macedonians, to serve as a buffer between themselves and other Europeans. The Romans had no such buffer civilization. As a result, conflict was a fairly constant affair on the Italian peninsula and the Romans, along with other peoples on the Italian peninsula, developed a military society fairly early in their history. We know almost nothing about the earliest peoples in Italy. The earliest people in Italy were Cro-Magnons, but by the Neolithic stage, they seem to be displaced by waves of migrations from Africa, Spain, and France. These peoples were themselves displaced by a new set of migrations in the Bronze Age, which began in Italy around 1500 BC, which violently displaced many of the populations already there. These new peoples came from across the Alps and across the Adriatic Sea to the east of the Italian peninsula. They were a nomadic people who were primarily herdsmen; they were also technologically superior. They worked bronze, used horses, and had wheeled carts. They were a war-like people and began to settle the mountainous areas of the Italian peninsula. We call these people Italic , and they include several ethnic groups: the Sabines, the Umbrians, and the Latins, with an infinity of others. Somewhere between 800 and 700 BC, two new groups of people began to settle the Italian peninsula. Unlike the earlier immigrants, these new colonists brought with them civilization: the Greeks and the Etruscans.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-3 21:17:51编辑过]

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2005-10-4 09:53:00

全英文的,我给大家补充点中文的资料,大家共享

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-10-4 09:53:00
罗马内战是公元前1世纪40—前30年代罗马奴隶制国家内部为争夺政权和建立军事独裁而进行的一场战争。战争的发动者是罗马晚期共和国时期著名的“前三头”和“后三头”。罗马内战的结果是屋大维最终获胜并开创了朱里亚·克劳狄王朝,当上了罗马帝国的第一个皇帝。罗马内战的结束是罗马共和国解体和罗马帝制全面建立的标志。

公元前146年,罗马进入晚期共和国时期。这一时期罗马出现全面危

复制代码
机,奴隶起义风起云涌,平民运动一浪高过一浪,社会矛盾和阶级矛盾极其尖锐和复杂。这种危机的集中表现形式是政体危机,也就是说,由于奴隶制发展达到高峰,共和制统治形式已经过时,帝制的建立是适应奴隶制发展的必然要求。但由于罗马共和国已为元老贵族盘据垄断,改制之争阻力极大,延续甚久,流血甚多。公元前133—前121年格拉古兄弟的民主改革遭到元老贵族的猛烈攻击,并在失败后遭到反动贵族的疯狂屠杀。这次改革虽然失败,但却揭开了罗马内战时代的序幕。元老贵族既已首先使用暴力屠杀群众,以后当会变本加厉大开杀戒,而反元老势力也会以兵戎相见,由内争转入内战。此后反元老势力仍继续改革派的传统,发出了平民运动的号召。但反元老斗争所担负的历史使命却不是平民要求的平分土地、维护小农之类,而是打击元老贵族、改变共和体制、建立军事独裁和皇帝统治的罗马帝国。正是在晚期罗马共和国危机重重、内部斗争不断激烈的形势下,涌现出了众多的英雄人物。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-10-4 09:54:00
公元前138—前132年和公元前104—前101年的两次西西里奴隶起义和公元前73—前71年的伟大的斯巴达克起义极大地震撼了罗马统治阶级,沉重摧毁了元老贵族不可一世的军政势力,为骑士和平民等反元老势力的抬头创造了条件。当元老们无人敢出头担任执政官时,正是其它势力乘虚而入的机会。就在此时,克拉苏斯取得执政大权,恺撒等人也从此东山再起,客观上推动了帝制取代共和制的历史转变。

公元前60年,步入政坛的三位新生实力派人物恺撒、克拉苏斯和庞培组成“前三头同盟”。公元前58年,恺撒出任高卢总督,并在长期的高卢战争中积蓄了实力。公元前53年,克拉苏斯在与安息作战中阵亡,于是三头先去其一,恺撒与庞培对抗之势日趋明显。高卢战争结束后,恺撒写成《高卢战记》一书在罗马广为散发,向公民宣传他的赫赫战功。更重要的是他已掌握了空前强大的实力,有久经征战的10个军团在他麾下,更有在高卢战争中掠夺的巨额财富供他在罗马网罗党羽、收买群众。这样的形势使庞培同元老院的联合更为紧密,他们把打击目标集中在恺撒及其党羽身上。公元前50年,元老院和庞培作出决定,恺撒应在第二任高卢总督期满时(前49年3月)交出兵权,解职回国。这等于公开宣布了“三头同盟”的决裂。恺撒回信要求庞培也放弃兵权,否则决不服从,并不惜兵戎相见。元老院视此信为战书,立即在前49年元旦决定恺撒应立即卸任。恺撒派的保民官安东尼等对此行使否决权不成反遭迫害,被迫逃往恺撒在山南高卢(北意大利)的军营,罗马内战一触即发。元老院马上宣布恺撒为公敌,全国处于紧急状态,授命庞培召集军队保卫罗马,不久内战正式开始。

恺撒听安东尼等汇报情况后,不顾只有1个军团留在身边的险境,毅然出击,于公元前49年1月率军越过意大利和高卢诸省的交界线卢比孔河,以迅雷不及掩耳之势直扑罗马。这是历史上一次著名的把握关键、当机立断、迅猛出击的军事行动,“越过卢比孔”遂成形容当机立断、义无返顾行动的典故。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-10-4 09:54:00
庞培估计,一经宣战,双方集结部队尚需时日,因此对恺撒跨越卢比孔的闪电行动毫无戒备。恺撒进军势如破竹,庞培和元老贵族措手不及、无力抵抗,仓皇逃往希腊。攻占罗马后,恺撒决定歼灭庞培留在西班牙的主力(7个军团),以保障后方安全和掌握战略主动权。他率领6个军团进军西班牙,失去首领的庞培军团未作认真抵抗即缴械投降,恺撒占领了整个西班牙。

为准备决战,凯撒推行各省居民和罗马人权利平等的政策,扩大了自己的社会基础。他的军队猛增至18个军团,而庞培在希腊总共只有9个军团。但是拥有东方广大地盘的庞培在兵员数量和军需储备上仍居优势,并且掌握着制海权。公元前49年11月,恺撒率领7个军团出其不意地在希腊登陆,开始东征。但他的另一支远征军(4个军团和1个骑兵队)由于敌人控制海面未能按时登陆,直到公元前48年春才同恺撒会合。遗憾的是,庞培贻误战机,未能各个歼灭恺撒军队。部队会合后,恺撒把庞培的几个军团围困在第拉希(今阿尔巴尼亚的都拉斯)的筑垒兵营里。但历时3个月的围困并未成功,只好撤到色萨利。庞培见敌退去,立即率军追击,双方于公元前48年8月在法塞拉斯进行了一场决战。恺撒以伏兵3000突然猛击庞培的精锐骑兵,导致敌左翼溃散,而庞培督师不力,未能及时巩固中军组织反击,终于一败涂地。庞培兵败逃往埃及,不久被人杀死。庞培死后3天,恺撒追击庞培军团在埃及登陆。他卷入了埃及内讧,打败了托勒密国王的部队,立克列奥帕特拉王后为国王。小亚的米特拉达蒂之子叛乱,恺撒驰援其地立奏凯歌。历史上留下了他那句“我来到了、我看见了、我胜利了”的名言。公元前46年,恺撒再次在非洲登陆,并在塔普苏斯城附近击溃贵族派军队。接着他又挥师西班牙,在公元前45年的孟达一战中击败庞培两个儿子的部队,从而胜利地结束了内战。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-10-4 09:55:00
罗马内战的第一阶段以恺撒击败庞培和元老贵族军队而告结束。战争的结果是恺撒建立了个人的军事独裁政权。他不仅被选为终身独裁官,而且还拥有统帅、大教长和祖国之父等尊号,集一切大权尊荣于一身,是名副其实的军事独裁者,或者说是罗马历史上第一个皇帝。日后西方历史上即以恺撒作为帝王的同义词,俄国沙皇之“沙”字即源于此。然而他的独裁未能完全消除共和传统的习惯势力,他未料到元老院的旧元老已利用这种传统势力把他的一些亲信转变为共和派,并在反对独裁、恢复共和的旗帜下密谋将其杀害,也未料到他和埃及女王克列奥帕特拉的婚姻和生下的儿子恺撒里昂成为敌人大肆利用的丑闻。公元前44年3月15日,恺撒的一位亲信布鲁图斯与同伙卡西乌斯在元老院会议厅向恺撒连刺23剑,一代天骄就这样死于亲信的剑下。

恺撒死后,安东尼成为恺撒派主要头目,他出兵镇压了因恺撒葬礼而引发的平民和奴隶暴动。由于安东尼领导下的恺撒派缺乏对夺权斗争的统一筹划,以“罗马散文泰斗”西塞罗为首的元老院的地位有所增强。加之这时恺撒的养子屋大维、一位年仅18岁的青年突然步入罗马政坛,也给元老院以可乘之机。屋大维是恺撒的甥孙(其姊之孙),在恺撒遗嘱中被定为继承人,得其遗产四分之三。安东尼和恺撒派的将领对这个从外地闻讯赶来奔丧的青年人相当轻视,然而屋大维却非同凡响,胆略兼备。他知道恺撒的声望和财产已成为自己的有力武器,遂大加利用,收揽人才,扩充实力,拉拢民众,居然顶住安东尼的排挤打击而自立门户,西塞罗和元老院也从此对他另眼相看,并利用他对抗安东尼。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群