以下是引用jimoshanlin在2005-10-10 10:23:27的发言： 完全没有思路，Solow模型都白学了，income per capita 和 capital per capita 的关系是 output 和 capital 的关系吗？如果不是，怎么解？各位大侠帮帮忙啊！
There is a 20 fold difference in income per capita between Canada and Bangladesh. If the Solow growth model is a good representation of the world, assuming that markets are competitive and that technology flows freely across countries.
a) If both economies are in steady state, what is the difference in capital per capita implied by this difference in income per capita.
b) Assuming there are not substantial differences in depreciation or population growth, what is the implied difference in saving.
c) How can the basic Solow model be modified to account for these differences if we want to preserve some degree of convergence.
income per capita 含义是人均收入；capital per capita 人均资本。
在加拿大和孟加拉之间存在的人均收益差异为20倍，如果索洛增长模型是对世界（经济）的一个良好描述，并且假定所有市场是完全竞争的，技术在国家间可以自由流动，那么
a）如果两个国家都处于稳态，由于上述人均收入的差异所隐含的人均资本的差异是多少？
b）假定在人口增长或衰退方面没有实质性的差异，那么隐含的差异是多少？
b）如果打算在一定程度上维持趋同观点，那么，应当对基本索洛增长模型进行怎样的修改？
扫码加好友，拉您进群
全部版块
我的主页
收藏
