全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学人 二区 学术资源/课程/会议/讲座 论文版
1438 0
2017-02-15

编按: Frontiers of Economics in China(FEC)2016年第4期重磅:世界银行中国区首席经济学家吴卓瑾、长江商学院经济学教授李伟、世界银行首席经济学家徐立新的合作论文《研发回报、溢出效应与公司激励:以中国为例证》。



1 论文标题


研发回报、溢出效应与公司激励:以中国为例证


2 作者信息


吴卓瑾,世界银行
李伟,长江商学院
徐立新,世界银行

3 出处和链接(比如,NBER working paper No.11000)

Chorching Goh,Lixin Colin Xu,Wei Li. R&D Returns, Spillovers and Firm Incentives: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(4): 581-607.


http://journal.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.3868/s060-005-016-0030-9

4 摘要


摘要:本文使用中国12000家企业的新数据集,估算了研发投资回报及其外溢效应,并探究了研发回报如何依赖于公司激励。就样本中的企业而言,结果显示在过去一年里企业平均在研发领域每增加1元投资,其产出增加约0.4元,且无论是否算入研发强度的内生问题,研发回报都较高。有趣的是,当企业首席执行官并非由ZF任命时,企业研发边际回报显著更高;而当企业首席执行官的薪资与其年度绩效直接相关时,企业的研发边际回报会更低。在相对贫穷地区以及欠缺融资渠道的企业,企业研发回报较高。此外,研发有不小的溢出效应。


Abstract: Using a new data set of 12,000 firms in China, this paper estimates the returns to R&D investment and its spillover effects, and investigates how the returns to R&D depend on firm incentives. For the firms in the sample, the results show that on average firm output increases around 0.4 yuan for each additional 1 yuan spent on R&D in the previous year, and there is high R&D return regardless of whether the endogeneity of R&D intensity is dealt with or not. Interestingly, the marginal return to R&D is significantly higher in firms whose CEOs were not appointed by the government, and lower when CEO pay is directly related to annual performance. The return to R&D is higher in relatively poor regions and for firms with worse access to finance. There are also non-trivial R&D spillover effects.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群