NO1. 下面是审稿人对某篇APL文章的评论
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized and Clear: Yes
Free From Errors: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: No
OVERALL RATING: Fair
NO.2 下面是审稿人对某篇JAP文章的评论
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS:
Reviewer Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision
Paper Interesting: No
Good Use of Space: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clearly Written: No
Spelling: Yes
Good Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Adequate References: No
Clear Figures: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal
NO.3 下面是Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters期刊编辑
要求审稿人审稿时要考虑的几个要点:
Quality and significance of the Article
Clarity of Presentation
Suitability for Letters
Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?)
Understandable to Non-Specialists?
Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted?
Recommendation
Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript?
审稿人对Manuscript的最终审稿结果:
Overall Rating: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers
Good Scientific Quality: Yes
Appropriate Journal: Yes
Satisfactory English/References: No
Tables/Figures Adequate: No
Significance Level: 4
Significance Level Comment:
The author fabricated a good inductor on Si substrate with high Q-factor.
Appropriate Title and Abstract: Yes