全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 真实世界经济学(含财经时事)
3057 9
2010-09-25
In 2040, the Chinese economy will reach $123 trillion, ornearly three times the economic output of the entire globe in 2000. China's percapita income will hit $85,000, more than double the forecast for the EuropeanUnion, and also much higher than that of India and Japan. In other words, theaverage Chinese megacity dweller will be living twice as well as the averageFrenchman when China goes from a poor country in 2000 to a superrich country in2040. Although it will not have overtaken the United States in per capitawealth, according to my forecasts, China's share of global GDP -- 40 percent -- willdwarf that of the United States (14 percent) and the European Union (5 percent)30 years from now. This is what economic hegemony will look like.

Most accounts of China's economic ascent offer little butvague or threatening generalities, and they usually grossly underestimate theextent of the rise -- and how fast it's coming. (For instance, a recent study bythe Carnegie Endowment for International Peace predicts that by 2050, China'seconomy will be just 20 percent larger than that of the United States.) Suchaccounts fail to fully credit the forces at work behind China's recent successor understand how those trends will shape the future. Even China's own economicdata in some ways actually underestimate economic outputs.

It's the same story with the relative decline of a Europeplagued by falling fertility as its era of global economic clout finally ends.Here, too, the trajectory will be more sudden and stark than most reportingsuggests. Europe's low birthrate and its muted consumerism mean itscontribution to global GDP will tumble to a quarter of its current share within30 years. At that point, the economy of the 15 earliest EU countries combinedwill be an eighth the size of China's.

This is what the future will look like in a generation. It'scoming sooner than we think.

What, precisely, does China have going so right for it?

The first essential factor that is often overlooked: theenormous investment China is making in education. More educated workers aremuch more productive workers. (As I have reported elsewhere, U.S. data indicatethat college-educated workers are three times as productive, and a high schoolgraduate is 1.8 times as productive, as a worker with less than a ninth-gradeeducation.) In China, high school and college enrollments are rising steeplydue to significant state investment. In 1998, then-President Jiang Zemin calledfor a massive increase in enrollment in higher education. At the time, just 3.4million students were enrolled in China's colleges and universities. Theresponse was swift: Over the next four years, enrollment in higher educationincreased 165 percent, and the number of Chinese studying abroad rose 152percent. Between 2000 and 2004, university enrollment continued to risesteeply, by about 50 percent. I forecast that China will be able to increaseits high school enrollment rate to the neighborhood of 100 percent and thecollege rate to about 50 percent over the next generation, which would byitself add more than 6 percentage points to the country's annual economicgrowth rate. These targets for higher education are not out of reach. It shouldbe remembered that several Western European countries saw college enrollment ratesclimb from about 25 to 50 percent in just the last two decades of the 20thcentury.
全文见:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/04/123000000000000
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2010-9-25 12:46:03
胡扯。。。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-9-25 12:49:49
可信度不是很高
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-9-25 13:02:42
看都没细看,就一棍子打死。有本事根据事实和数据拿出理由来,去看看原文国外各朋友的讨论,你会觉得汗颜。

难怪凤凰卫视的窦文涛说,中国网上讨论经常没有思想的交锋,而国外的讨论一直能保持有理有据的纯观点争论,这就是差距。

对于Fogel的这个预测,我自己没有好好看他的文章,不过也不是不可能,想象看20年前,如有人说中国GDP20年后能达到世界第二,估计大多人也会说“胡扯”,可是就能胡扯出事实来。我本人并不把这个预测当真,仅仅作为中国经济实力的一个前景描述罢了,但我相信中国总有一天能达到稳中所说30%-40%的世界GDP水平,因为这也是200年前中国的GDP水平,我相信现在的中国人同我们的祖先一样勤劳,聪明,也能创造我们祖先所创造的成绩。当然,现在我们也面临很多问题,但是时间会告诉我们这些问题能得到怎样的解决。实际上,我的研究兴趣之一就是识别中国经济在未来30年中的主要风险。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-9-25 13:25:52
中国的经济能高速发展60年吗?(从1978年算起)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-9-25 13:52:37
stanleyjunjun 发表于 2010-9-25 13:02
看都没细看,就一棍子打死。有本事根据事实和数据拿出理由来,去看看原文国外各朋友的讨论,你会觉得汗颜。

难怪凤凰卫视的窦文涛说,中国网上讨论经常没有思想的交锋,而国外的讨论一直能保持有理有据的纯观点争论,这就是差距。

对于Fogel的这个预测,我自己没有好好看他的文章,不过也不是不可能,想象看20年前,如有人说中国GDP20年后能达到世界第二,估计大多人也会说“胡扯”,可是就能胡扯出事实来。我本人并不把这个预测当真,仅仅作为中国经济实力的一个前景描述罢了,但我相信中国总有一天能达到稳中所说30%-40%的世界GDP水平,因为这也是200年前中国的GDP水平,我相信现在的中国人同我们的祖先一样勤劳,聪明,也能创造我们祖先所创造的成绩。当然,现在我们也面临很多问题,但是时间会告诉我们这些问题能得到怎样的解决。实际上,我的研究兴趣之一就是识别中国经济在未来30年中的主要风险。
飞速发展没错  回到200年前的30%~40%就有点自我陶醉的意思了
资本是种只讲利益不讲情义的东西  勤劳、聪明的确值得称赞 但在资本运作面前被碾压成粉尘你还不知道怎么死的
正如现在国内财富不均是因为权贵阶级不断压榨下一层 层层盘剥把压力最终转嫁给最底层   国际资本及发达国家也是靠压榨中国来致富的(对,然后我们的国家和企业再转嫁给更弱势者)

它不会坐视你崛起 也不会允许你崛起 你能想象所有人都坐办公室 没有一个农民工给你盖办公室嘛? 对不起,上层席位是稀缺的,座位已满,下次请早
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群