Journal of Accounting and Economics
Volume 17, Issues 1-2, January 1994, Pages 255-278
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90012-4 | How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Copyright ? 1994 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Permissions & Reprints
Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? *1: Evidence from hospital departments
This article is not included in your organization's subscription. However, you may be able to access this article under your organization's agreement with Elsevier.
Eric Noreen
Eric Noreen and Naomi Soderstrom
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Available online 5 March 2002.
Abstract
Using cross-sectional data from hospitals in Washington State, we test whether overhead costs are proportional to overhead activities. This assumption is at the heart of nearly all cost accounting systems, which implicitly assume that marginal cost is equal to average cost. Empirically, the proportionality hypothesis can be rejected for most of the overhead accounts. On average across the accounts, the average cost per unit of activity overstates marginal costs by about 40% and in some departments by over 100%. Thus, the average cost per activity should be used with a great deal of caution in decisions.
Article Outline
? References
*1 We would like to thank the staff of the Washington State Department of Health for their able assistance without which this research would have been impossible. We would also like to thank participants in the University of Washington, University of Oregon, and University of British Columbia annual workshop, and Bob Bowen, Jim Jiambalvo, Robert Kaplan, Lauren Kelly, Susan Moyer, Ken Merchant, Chris Stinson, and particularly Dave Burgstahler for their comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Volume 17, Issues 1-2, January 1994, Pages 255-278