摘要翻译：
我发现在无词回忆中，总的检索时间与回忆的项目总数呈线性增长。测量斜率，检索一个附加项目的时间，根据呈现率、主题年龄以及列表呈现后是否有延迟，每个项目从1.4秒到4.5秒不等。这些检索附加项目的时间服从第二个线性关系，作为在实验中平均的回忆概率的函数，显着独立于受试者的年龄、呈现率和列表呈现后是否有延迟。第二个线性关系模拟了识别和线索回忆的关系(Tarnow，2008)，这表明自由回忆检索使用与识别或线索回忆相同的再激活机制。如果召回概率接近0%，外推法将检索附加项的时间限制在每项最多7.2秒。早期的识别和提示回忆的上限随着项目类型的不同而变化，在每个项目0.2到1.8秒之间(Tarnow，2008)。暗示包括短时记忆只有两种类型：工作记忆和再激活。
---
英文标题：
《Free Recall Shows Similar Reactivation Behavior as Recognition & Cued
  Recall》
---
作者：
Eugen Tarnow
---
最新提交年份：
2016
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Quantitative Biology        数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology        其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--

---
英文摘要：
  I find that the total retrieval time in word free recall increases linearly with the total number of items recalled. Measured slopes, the time to retrieve an additional item, vary from 1.4-4.5 seconds per item depending upon presentation rate, subject age and whether there is a delay after list presentation or not. These times to retrieve an additional item obey a second linear relationship as a function of the recall probability averaged over the experiment, explicitly independent of subject age, presentation rate and whether there is a delay after the list presentation or not. This second linear relationship mimics the relationships in recognition and cued recall (Tarnow, 2008) which suggests that free recall retrieval uses the same reactivation mechanism as recognition or cued recall. Extrapolation limits the time to retrieve an additional item to a maximum of 7.2 seconds per item if the probability of recall is near 0%. Earlier upper limits for recognition and cued recall varied with the item type between 0.2 and 1.8 seconds per item (Tarnow, 2008). Implications include that there are only two types of short term memory: working memory and reactivation.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.05686