全部版块 我的主页
论坛 计量经济学与统计论坛 五区 计量经济学与统计软件 EViews专版
3505 1
2014-03-04
求高人指点,协整检验结果如下:
问题:1,为什么没有常数C呢,是我的检验方法有问题?
          2,如果正确,那么协整方程是多少?

Date: 03/04/14   Time: 20:19

Sample (adjusted): 2004 2011

Included observations: 8 after adjustments

Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend

Series: HP RM

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

Hypothesized

Trace

5 Percent

1 Percent

No. of CE(s)

Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Critical Value

None **

0.977540

32.46957

15.41

20.04

At most 1

0.231017

2.101491

  3.76

  6.65

Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating equation(s) at both 5% and 1% levels

*(**) denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 5%(1%) level

Hypothesized

Max-Eigen

5 Percent

1 Percent

No. of CE(s)

Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Critical Value

None **

0.977540

30.36808

14.07

18.63

At most 1

0.231017

2.101491

  3.76

  6.65

Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating equation(s) at both 5% and 1% levels

*(**) denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 5%(1%) level

Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*S11*b=I):

HP

RM

-0.000119

2.66E-10

0.000338

1.66E-10

Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha):

D(HP)

283.3834

-476.8764

D(RM)

-5.46E+09

5.68E+08

1 Cointegrating Equation(s):

Log likelihood

-241.6626

Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)

HP

RM

1.000000

-2.23E-06

(1.9E-07)

Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses)

D(HP)

-0.033718

(0.05908)

D(RM)

649520.1

(85819.9)

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2014-5-13 16:04:26
应该跟你选择的检验形式有关系,另外Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)这一部分显示的就是协整方程啊,即  HP=-2.23E-06RM
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群