xiongjerry 发表于 2015-7-25 00:28 
恩,我就是这个意思。如果使用GMM做DPD,应该不用将解释变量滞后的。不明白为什么很多文章都是这样处理的 ...
请问你一下,我是300多家公司,5年的面板数据,我在确定被解释变量的滞后项时,用回归分析2阶是显著的,因此只将被解释变量的滞后项放入gmm中,其他解释变量和控制变量都放入iv中,这样出来的结果中,AR2是yige 黑点,您知道这是怎么回事儿吗?详情见如下:
Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -7.11 Pr > z = 0.000
Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = . Pr > z = .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(6) = 6.73 Prob > chi2 = 0.346
(Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)
Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(6) = 5.40 Prob > chi2 = 0.493
(Robust, but weakened by many instruments.)
Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
GMM instruments for levels
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(3) = 2.55 Prob > chi2 = 0.466
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3) = 2.85 Prob > chi2 = 0.415