全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 经管百科 爱问频道
2845 2
2015-06-24

1.  According to the following estimated equation, try to study the tradeoff between time spent sleeping and working.

SLEEP_hat= 3,586.25 0.148 TOTWRK 11.13 EDUC +2.20 AGE

         (112.28)     (0.017)         (5.88)     (1.45)

n= 706, R-squared= 0.113, Adj. R_squared= 0.110,

Here sleep and totwrk are the time spent in sleeping and working per week in minutes, educ and age are measured in years. The standard errors are in the parentheses below the estimated coefficients.

(i) Is either education or age individually significant at 5% level against a two-sided alternative? Show your work.

(ii) Dropping educ and age from the equation gives

SLEEP_hat= 3,586.38 0.151 TOTWRK

(38.91) (0.017)

        n = 706, R-squared= 0.103, Adj. R_squared= 0.102.

       Are educ and age jointly significant in the original equation at 5% level? Show your work.

(iii)   Dropping age from the original equation gives

SLEEP_hat = 3756.22 — 0.149*TOTWRK — 13.50*EDUC

             (81.29)     (0.017)        (5.68)

      n = 706, R-squared= 0.103.

       What is the estimated adjusted R-squared? (keeping 3 decimals)

(iii) Which of the above three estimated equations do you prefer? Why?

(iv) What is the estimated tradeoff between time spent sleeping and working? Is that statistically significant at 1% level?

(v) If someone works five more hours per week, by how many minutes is sleep predicted to fall? Is this a large tradeoff?


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2015-6-24 21:36:23
建议楼主自己找本书(如古扎拉蒂《计量经济学基础》、伍德里奇《计量经济学导论》)看看,了解基本原理后再来做这些题。挺简单的。祝好运。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2015-6-24 21:39:14
古扎拉低的计量经济学比较容易懂,中文版的
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群