摘要翻译：
本文对少数民族游戏文献进行了批判性的叙述。少数派博弈是一个简单的拥挤博弈：玩家需要在两个选项中进行选择，选择了少数派选择的选项的人获胜。本文中提出的学习模型似乎与经济学中常用的学习模型有明显的不同。我们将少数博弈文献中的学习模型与标准的博弈论学习模型联系起来，并表明它实际上与这些模型有许多共同的特点。然而，该学习模型的预测与大多数其他学习模型的预测有很大差异。我们讨论了少数博弈文献中提出的学习模型的主要预测，并将这些预测与拥挤博弈的实验结果进行了比较。
---
英文标题：
《The minority game: An economics perspective》
---
作者：
Willemien Kets
---
最新提交年份：
2007
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：General Finance        一般财务
分类描述：Development of general quantitative methodologies with applications in finance
通用定量方法的发展及其在金融中的应用
--
一级分类：Physics        物理学
二级分类：Physics and Society        物理学与社会
分类描述：Structure, dynamics and collective behavior of societies and groups (human or otherwise). Quantitative analysis of social networks and other complex networks. Physics and engineering of infrastructure and systems of broad societal impact (e.g., energy grids, transportation networks).
社会和团体（人类或其他）的结构、动态和集体行为。社会网络和其他复杂网络的定量分析。具有广泛社会影响的基础设施和系统（如能源网、运输网络）的物理和工程。
--

---
英文摘要：
  This paper gives a critical account of the minority game literature. The minority game is a simple congestion game: players need to choose between two options, and those who have selected the option chosen by the minority win. The learning model proposed in this literature seems to differ markedly from the learning models commonly used in economics. We relate the learning model from the minority game literature to standard game-theoretic learning models, and show that in fact it shares many features with these models. However, the predictions of the learning model differ considerably from the predictions of most other learning models. We discuss the main predictions of the learning model proposed in the minority game literature, and compare these to experimental findings on congestion games.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0706.4432