摘要翻译：
达尔文选择的概念在经济理论中已经隐含了至少六十年。理查德·纳尔逊和西德尼·温特认为，虽然进化思想在战前经济学中盛行，但战后新古典学派几乎完全专注于均衡条件及其数学条件。对通过竞争进行企业选择的经济学解释的问题之一是对一个不完整的科学范式的理解薄弱。作为I.F。普莱斯指出，“生物学隐喻长期潜伏在管理理论的背景中，主要是因为‘适者生存’的信息（通常被错误地归因于查尔斯·达尔文而不是赫伯特·斯宾塞）为市场竞争提供了一个看似自然的模型（例如阿尔奇安1950年、梅雷尔1984年、亨德森1989年、摩尔1993年），而没有严重挑战组织是什么的潜在范式。”本文借鉴Kauffman、Arthur、McKelvey、Nelson和Winter以及Windrum和Birchenhall的最新研究成果，探讨了动态适应度景观模型在经济理论中的应用，特别是在技术替代理论中的应用。特别是，我们使用Post教授与John Holland在遗传算法方面的早期工作来解释静态和动态经济建模方法之间的一些关键差异。
---
英文标题：
《Adaptation and Coevolution on an Emergent Global Competitive Landscape》
---
作者：
Philip V. Fellman, Jonathan Vos Post, Roxana Wright and Usha Dasari
---
最新提交年份：
2007
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：General Finance        一般财务
分类描述：Development of general quantitative methodologies with applications in finance
通用定量方法的发展及其在金融中的应用
--
一级分类：Physics        物理学
二级分类：Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems        自适应和自组织系统
分类描述：Adaptation, self-organizing systems, statistical physics, fluctuating systems, stochastic processes, interacting particle systems, machine learning
自适应，自组织系统，统计物理，波动系统，随机过程，相互作用粒子系统，机器学习
--

---
英文摘要：
  Notions of Darwinian selection have been implicit in economic theory for at least sixty years. Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter have argued that while evolutionary thinking was prevalent in prewar economics, the postwar Neoclassical school became almost entirely preoccupied with equilibrium conditions and their mathematical conditions. One of the problems with the economic interpretation of firm selection through competition has been a weak grasp on an incomplete scientific paradigm. As I.F. Price notes, "The biological metaphor has long lurked in the background of management theory largely because the message of 'survival of the fittest' (usually wrongly attributed to Charles Darwin rather than Herbert Spencer) provides a seemingly natural model for market competition (e.g. Alchian 1950, Merrell 1984, Henderson 1989, Moore 1993), without seriously challenging the underlying paradigms of what an organisation is." In this paper we examine the application of dynamic fitness landscape models to economic theory, particularly the theory of technology substitution, drawing on recent work by Kauffman, Arthur, McKelvey, Nelson and Winter, and Windrum and Birchenhall. In particular we use Professor Post's early work with John Holland on the genetic algorithm to explain some of the key differences between static and dynamic approaches to economic modeling.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0707.0854