摘要翻译：
社会流动性反映了儿童的社会经济地位在多大程度上独立于其父母的地位。为了衡量社会流动性，最广泛使用的社会经济地位指标是收入、教育和职业。虽然基于收入的社会流动测量争议较少，但印度背景下的数据可用性限制了我们沿着教育或职业的维度观察流动模式。在本研究中，我们沿着这两个主要维度观察了不同社会群体的社会流动模式，并发现尽管SCS/STS在教育方面的向上和向下流动前景近年来有所改善，但职业流动模式却相当令人担忧。这些结果促使有必要调和教育和职业方面的不同趋势，以便更全面地了解该国的社会流动情况。
---
英文标题：
《Patterns of social mobility across social groups in India》
---
作者：
Vinay Reddy Venumuddala
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  Social mobility captures the extent to which socio-economic status of children, is independent of status of their respective parents. In order to measure social mobility, most widely used indicators of socio-economic status are income, education and occupation. While social mobility measurement based on income is less contested, data availability in Indian context limits us to observing mobility patterns along the dimensions of either education or occupation. In this study we observe social mobility patterns for different social groups along these two main dimensions, and find that while upward and downward mobility prospects in education for SCs/STs is somewhat improving in the recent times, occupational mobility patterns are rather worrisome. These results motivate the need for reconciling disparate trends along education and occupation, in order to get a more comprehensive picture of social mobility in the country.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.06771