摘要翻译：
电力市场最初是为可调度发电厂和不灵活的需求而设计的，但现在正日益受到新趋势的挑战，如间歇性可再生能源的高度渗透和消费者能源空间的转变。为了适应这些新趋势并提高市场的性能，文献中提出了对当前市场设计的几种修改。鉴于这些建议种类繁多，本文对文献中提出的修改进行了全面的调查，并详细评估了它们在不断发展的电力环境下改善市场绩效的适用性。为此，本文首先提出了一套理想市场设计的准则，并指出了当前市场设计中阻碍实现这些准则的障碍。然后，对文献中提出的不同的市场解决方案进行了广泛的探讨，这些方案可以潜在地缓解这些障碍。最后，提出了拟议解决办法的分类，突出说明了每项提案所处理的障碍和相关的执行挑战。这项分析的结果表明，即使每个障碍至少有一个建议的解决方案来解决，但没有一个单一的建议能够同时解决所有的障碍。在这方面，一个面向未来的市场设计必须结合拟议解决方案的不同要素，以全面减轻市场障碍并克服已确定的实施挑战。因此，通过彻底回顾这一丰富的文献，本文介绍了关键的贡献，使先进的国家向日益有效的电力市场推进。
---
英文标题：
《Short Term Electricity Market Designs: Identified Challenges and
  Promising Solutions》
---
作者：
Lina Silva-Rodriguez (1, 2 and 3), Anibal Sanjab (1 and 2), Elena
  Fumagalli (3), Ana Virag (1 and 2), Madeleine Gibescu (3) ((1) Flemish
  Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Belgium, (2) EnergyVille,
  Belgium, (3) Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development - Utrecht
  University, Netherlands)
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：Theoretical Economics        理论经济学
分类描述：Includes theoretical contributions to Contract Theory, Decision Theory, Game Theory, General Equilibrium, Growth, Learning and Evolution, Macroeconomics, Market and Mechanism Design, and Social Choice.
包括对契约理论、决策理论、博弈论、一般均衡、增长、学习与进化、宏观经济学、市场与机制设计、社会选择的理论贡献。
--
一级分类：Mathematics        数学
二级分类：Optimization and Control        优化与控制
分类描述：Operations research, linear programming, control theory, systems theory, optimal control, game theory
运筹学，线性规划，控制论，系统论，最优控制，博弈论
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  The electricity market, which was initially designed for dispatchable power plants and inflexible demand, is being increasingly challenged by new trends, such as the high penetration of intermittent renewables and the transformation of the consumers energy space. To accommodate these new trends and improve the performance of the market, several modifications to current market designs have been proposed in the literature. Given the vast variety of these proposals, this paper provides a comprehensive investigation of the modifications proposed in the literature as well as a detailed assessment of their suitability for improving market performance under the continuously evolving electricity landscape. To this end, first, a set of criteria for an ideal market design is proposed, and the barriers present in current market designs hindering the fulfillment of these criteria are identified. Then, the different market solutions proposed in the literature, which could potentially mitigate these barriers, are extensively explored. Finally, a taxonomy of the proposed solutions is presented, highlighting the barriers addressed by each proposal and the associated implementation challenges. The outcomes of this analysis show that even though each barrier is addressed by at least one proposed solution, no single proposal is able to address all the barriers simultaneously. In this regard, a future-proof market design must combine different elements of proposed solutions to comprehensively mitigate market barriers and overcome the identified implementation challenges. Thus, by thoroughly reviewing this rich body of literature, this paper introduces key contributions enabling the advancement of the state-of-the-art towards increasingly efficient electricity market.
---
PDF下载：
-->