<div style="LINE-HEIGHT: 22px; HEIGHT: 22px;"></div><div style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 10px; ; OVERFLOW-X: hidden; WIDTH: 97%; WORD-BREAK: break-all; TEXT-INDENT: 24px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; HEIGHT: 200px; WORD-WRAP: break-word;"><p>书上是这样写的：</p><p>The advantage of Pareto's definitions is that they do not require us to make interpersonal coparisons of people's utilities. Since there are winners but no losers if resources can be allocated to achieve a Pareto improvement, we can argue that social welfare must be higher. In practice, however, most reallocations create winners and losers. <strong>We can still avoid the need to make interpersonal comparisons of utility by assuming lump-sum redistribution.</strong> That is, income can be resheffled without any loss in economic efficiency. The assumption that lump-sum redistribution can be used to ensure that no one loses from a Pareto improving reallocation is called the copensation principle.</p><p></p><p>粗体的是什么意思，存在不影响效率的再分配吗？他要表达的涵义是什么？不是要做翻译！！！</p></div>

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-27 4:30:06编辑过]