股份制是现代企业组织资本的方式之一，它本身并不反映社会经济制度的性质，关键在于控股权在谁手中。如果国家、集体控股，那么就具有公有性。

Thank you for your insight analysis.
Very impressive.

However, I believe there is a effective way to mitigate the internal conflict of interest.
It is called ESOP.  The employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is an employee-owner method that provides a company's workforce with an ownership interest in the company.

In an ESOP, companies provide their employees with stock ownership, often at no up-front cost to the employees. ESOP shares, however, are part of employees' remuneration for work performed. Shares are allocated to employees and may be held in an ESOP trust until the employee retires or leaves the company. The shares are then sold.

By this way, ultimate goal could be realized.

我十分赞同你的观点。任何一本政治经济学教科书上讲“公有制”与“私有制”的本质区在于分配。股份制仅仅是组织形式，更何况公有制在实际生活中的组织形式更为复杂导致“公有制”组织形式或者“公有制”占主体的组织形式下未必必然导致公有制的或公有制占主体的分配形式。所以，即使国家或者集体（姑且不讨论全民经济和集体经济的内涵，就看成是一个权利主体）控股，也可能产生私有的分配。

个人觉得只要能实现国家和集体的控股，就可以，股份制等形式不重要，重要的是怎样才能更好地促进公有制的发展就好