全部版块 我的主页
论坛 计量经济学与统计论坛 五区 计量经济学与统计软件
1923 5
2010-03-07
i did ols...and there are 9 control variables in my ols model.
firstly i add control one by one and individually together with dependent and independent variable. and i found there are 3 control variables are siginificant.
but then i did ols with every variable together, then it showed that there are only one control variable is siginificant. but the independent variable is always significant with both ways like i explained as above.


so strange..which one is corret? and what i should deal with this? if the control variable is not siginificant then i should delete them out from my ols model?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2010-3-7 07:41:50
you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined.

hence, it is true that only one variable should be taken when you have concerned all the factors listed together in this model.  

however, you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these two variables, which were initially significant in each individual models , are driven away from the whole model.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-3-7 07:44:34
Lord长空一剑 发表于 2010-3-7 07:41
you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined. then you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these to variables are driven away from the whole model.
wow..i did not expect it would be so quick like this..thank you for your kind answer!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-3-7 07:50:13
not at all,
actually I have just logged in today, and I saw it.
3# jiliangamelia
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-3-7 07:53:53
I have done slightly a bit literal change in my answer , i did not expect you reply to my answer so soon, too.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-3-7 08:14:12
Lord长空一剑 发表于 2010-3-7 07:41
you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined.

hence, it is true that only one variable should be taken when you have concerned all the factors listed together in this model.  

however, you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these two variables, which were initially significant in each individual models , are driven away from the whole model.
When i analyse the control variables individually, there are three significant ones.....DR ER FS. and then when i put them together, there is only one left. that is FS. and then i found DR and ER have collinearity....i used correlation matrix table to analyse collinearity.

I was wonderring, when variables have collinearity, i do not need to delete them..right? the book said sometimes after deleting, maybe new problems come up...so should i understand it as i can keep them and do nothing...or i should do something to deal with collinearity?

i have a question:
can i keep DR and ER? And for other control variables that are always insignificant, should i delete them or else?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群