你把结果贴出来啊

2# wyz5476
Date: 10/02/10   Time: 16:40   
Sample (adjusted): 1990 2008   
Included observations: 19 after adjustments   
Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend   
Series: FAI CPI     
Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1   
   
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)   
   
Hypothesized  Trace 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
   
None *  0.589991  20.97149  15.49471  0.0068
At most 1 *  0.191185  4.031522  3.841466  0.0446
   
Trace test indicates 2 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level   
* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level   
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values   
   
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)   
   
Hypothesized  Max-Eigen 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
   
None *  0.589991  16.93997  14.26460  0.0184
At most 1 *  0.191185  4.031522  3.841466  0.0446
   
Max-eigenvalue test indicates 2 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level   
* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level   
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values   
   
Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*S11*b=I):     
   
FAI CPI   
-0.131682  0.140049   
0.001388 -0.180707   
   
   
Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha):     
   
D(FAI)  6.229525  2.894706  
D(CPI) -1.435495  0.637981  
   
   
1 Cointegrating Equation(s):   Log likelihood -105.9950
   
Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)   
FAI CPI   
1.000000 -1.063542   
  (0.29295)   
   
Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses)   
D(FAI) -0.820314   
  (0.28608)   
D(CPI)  0.189028   
  (0.06416)

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

结果显示存在协整，在5%的显著水平下拒绝原假设。

5# xsx786 那请问我在论文中应该如何描述这一结论 这个结论是否代表我可以进行下一步的格兰杰因果检验