全部版块 我的主页
论坛 金融投资论坛 六区 金融学(理论版)
4346 11
2010-10-23
悬赏 3 个论坛币 已解决
If the CAPM is true, all stocks must have expected returns that are greater than zero. Is it true? Why?

谢谢/

最佳答案

liguanyi_ya 查看完整内容

It may happen when yu come across stocks that can act as insurance, investors may require lower expected return even negative return. Tenically, if you put negative beta (i.e. insurance stock) into CAPM, it is possible to negative result, which is consistent with the statement above. In your question, all stocks does not necessarily have expected returns that are greater than zero theoreticall ...
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2010-10-23 10:43:29
It may happen when yu come across stocks that can act as insurance, investors may require lower expected return even negative return. Tenically, if you put negative beta (i.e. insurance stock) into CAPM, it is possible to negative result, which is consistent with the statement above.

In your question, all stocks does not necessarily have expected returns that are greater than zero theoretically, althought they do in most real-world cases.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-10-23 10:51:06
NO , because Beta can be negative.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-10-24 09:10:08
No,the reason is that the market return may be under the risk-free return.but this is not always set up.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-10-25 21:42:09
李磊鑫 发表于 2010-10-24 09:10
No,the reason is that the market return may be under the risk-free return.but this is not always set up.
market return may be under the risk-free return? how come?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-10-27 05:43:33
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群